国内外卒中患者照顾者领域研究热点与前沿可视化分析 Visual Analysis of Research Hotspots and Frontier in the Field of Caregivers of Stroke Patients in China and Abroad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
目的 以文献计量学为基础，应用CiteSpace软件对国内外卒中患者照顾者领域研究现状及热点问题进行分析，为深入开展该领域的研究提供参考。 方法 在中国知网和Web of Science数据库中检索从建库至2021年12月31日卒中患者照顾者领域的中英文文献，文献类型包括论著、综述、学位论文、会议论文。去除重复文献后，从发文量、作者、机构、国家、关键词等方面进行文献计量学分析。 结果 共纳入1298篇中文文献（中国知网），1763篇英文文献（Web of Science）。对于卒中患者照顾者的研究，中英文文献发表均整体呈逐年上升趋势，中国知网数据库中，发文量从2002年的4篇增至2021年的164篇；郑州大学张振香是发文量最多（48篇）的作者，郑州大学护理与健康学院（50篇）是该领域发文量最多的机构；除主题词外，“影响因素”“照顾能力”“照顾负担”“抑郁”“焦虑”“自我感受负担”等为高频关键词。在Web of Science数据库中，发文量从2009年的103篇增至2021年的201篇；美国发文量最多（565篇），约翰霍普金斯医学院的Roth在作者中发文量最多，Univ Toronto（55篇）在发文机构中居首位；“quality of life”“rehabilitation”“support”“burden”“care”“depression symptom”“survivor”等为高频关键词。 结论 国内外卒中患者照顾者领域的研究处于稳定发展阶段，发文作者、发文机构均呈现以高校和地域为中心的特点，但缺乏跨区域和跨单位合作；国内外研究热点不同，照顾负担及照顾能力的影响因素、卒中照顾者负性情绪为国内研究热点，照顾者生活质量的影响因素、照顾负担和抑郁症状、照顾者主导的康复对卒中患者的影响是国外研究热点。临床或科研工作者应加强各研究机构之间的合作，关注该领域的研究前沿和热点，提高研究深度和广度。 Abstract: Objective Based on bibliometrics, CiteSpace software was used to analyze the current research status and hot issues in the field of caregivers of stroke patients at home and abroad, to provide reference for further research in this field. Methods The relevant literature in the field of caregivers of stroke patients was retrieved from the China National Knowledge Network (CNKI) and Web of Science database from the database inception to December 31, 2021. The types of articles included clinical trials, reviews, dissertations and conference papers. Bibliometric analysis was conducted in terms of the number of papers, authors, institutions, countries and keywords. Results A total of 1298 Chinese and 1763 English literature were included. The number of these published articles is on the rise year by year both at home and abroad. In the database of CNKI, the number of published articles increased from 4 in 2002 to 164 in 2021. Zhang Zhenxiang of Zhengzhou University published the most (48 articles), and the Nursing and Health College of Zhengzhou University published the most (50 articles). In addition to the subject words, "influencing factors" "caring ability" "caring burden" "depression" "anxiety" and "self-perceived burden" were high-frequency keywords. In the Web of Science database, the number of published articles increased from 103 in 2009 to 201 in 2021, and the United States published the most (565 articles); Dr. ROTH D L of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine published the most; the Univ Toronto had the most publications (55 articles). "Quality of life" "rehabilitation" "support" "burden" "care" "depression symptom" and "survivor" were high-frequency keywords. Conclusion The research on caregivers of stroke patients at home and abroad was in a stable development stage in the recent ten years. The authors and institutions of these papers were all characterized by universities and regions, and lack of cross-regional and cross-unit cooperation. Domestic and foreign research hotspots were different. The influencing factors of caring burden and caring ability, and negative emotion of stroke caregivers were hot issues in China. The influencing factors of stroke caregivers' quality of life, caring burden and depressive symptoms of caregivers, and the influence of rehabilitation led by caregivers on stroke patients were hot issues abroad. The clinical and research workers should strengthen the cooperation among research institutions, pay attention to the research frontiers and hotspots, to improve the depth and breadth of research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".