MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910500773 · doi:10.4224/crm.2021.ncap-1

NCAP-1: Reference Material for SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein

2021· other· en· W6910500773 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNRC Digital Repository · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntigenTrisBuffer (optical fiber)SodiumReference data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NCAP-1 is a reference material (RM) designed for the development of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein detection methods, as well as an antigen source for use in SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests. The reference values for NCAP-1 are based on combined results from two orthogonal methods from data generated at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). A unit of NCAP-1 contains 0.4 mL of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 8) with 150 mM sodium chloride.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2310.270

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNRC Digital RepositoryFrench-language works237,207