MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910651412 · doi:10.48336/254v-ea17

Place recognition and factor graph localization for mobile robots using Google indoor street view

2021· article· en· W6910651412 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile robotRobotConsistency (knowledge bases)GraphOdometryCutSimilarity (geometry)Position (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis develops an indoor localization system for mobile robots using Google indoor street view. The proposed localization system consists of two main modules. The first is a place recognition system based on Google’s indoor street view. Its purpose is to determine the position of the robot in terms of the node on the street view map that is closest to the robot’s actual location. It is achieved by comparing an image captured by the robot’s camera against the indoor street view images. In order to achieve the best accuracy possible, the input image is compared to every street view image. The system employs two verification stages. The first stage is based on the visual similarity among the images. The best five images that qualified through this stage become candidate images for the second verification stage. In this stage, the geometric consistency between the images is assessed. The image that passes this test with the highest similarity score is considered a match with the input image. The proposed place recognition system is tested on different data sets and the performance is assessed using standard evaluation metrics. The second part is the main module of the proposed localization system. It is a graph-based estimation module that incorporates the odometry data, visual feedback, and motion data that eventually is solved via optimization techniques. The result is the estimates of the robot’s locations at specified intervals along its journey. It uses odometry data to interpret connections among successive poses. Also, it uses visual information from the robot’s camera to establish constraints between the robot’s poses and the map. It is achieved through constraints derived using two images, one from the robot’s camera and one from the node in the map that matches best with the image from the robot’s camera. The localization system is designed to minimize the drift caused by the odometer. The system is simulated and then tested for a data set captured at the Memorial University of Newfoundland engineering building basement. The performance of the system is evaluated using standard error metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207