MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6910682406 · doi:10.5061/dryad.280gb5n0z

Mean daily river temperature of the Coppermine River, Nunavut, during the ice-free season 2018-2023

2025· dataset· en· W6910682406 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsOverwinteringArcticFish migrationClimate changeCline (biology)Environmental change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shifts in migration timing in response to climate change have implications for fitness and survival of cold-adapted species. We used acoustic telemetry to investigate and compare environmental influences on freshwater return between sympatric anadromous Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) and Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma malma), and between overwintering locations (above or below an obstacle – a substantial cascade). Both Arctic Char and Dolly Varden that overwintered below the cascade returned to freshwater when sea surface temperature was warm and river temperature was cool, whereas Dolly Varden that overwintered above the cascade returned to freshwater at cooler sea surface temperatures and during warm and likely stressful river temperatures. Ascension of the cascade by Dolly Varden (no Arctic Char were observed to ascend the cascade) was likely assisted by high tide but unaffected by other environmental factors, including temperature. Fish demonstrated plasticity in response to inter-annual variation in environmental conditions, but may experience decoupling of environmental cues and suitable migratory conditions, which could impact persistence of these ecologically and culturally important species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→