MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910904232 · doi:10.5061/dryad.zpc866tbh

A Twitter dataset for Monkeypox outbreak in 2022

2022· dataset· en· W6910904232 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersInternational Development Research CentreStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaDiafiltrationProteogenomicsHemopericardiumLiquationFusible alloy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Right after the COVID-19 pandemic, the Monkeypox virus has infected people from more than twenty different countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has badly hit the healthcare system, social culture, and the global economy. The world does not have the strength to go through another catastrophe. Thus, it is very important to contain Monkeypox and stop the spread. This dataset includes the tweet id and user id of 2,400,202 tweets gathered using keywords related to Monkeypox for researchers to study on different subjects such as Monkeypox trend prediction, Monkeypox stigmatization, and Monkeypox misinformation and fake news detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207