MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910929401 · doi:10.5061/dryad.d51c5b000

The influence of bat ecology on viral diversity and reservoir status

2020· dataset· en· W6910929401 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDRYAD · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)Host (biology)BiodiversityGenetic diversitySpecies diversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bats host a diversity of viruses, some zoonotic. Repeated emergence of diseases that jump into humans from bat reservoirs highlights a need for predictive approaches to pre-emptively identify virus-carrying species. We use a machine learning approach to examine drivers of viral diversity in bats, and differences in those drivers between RNA and DNA viruses. We find bat species with longer lifespans, broad geographic distributions in the eastern hemisphere, and large group sizes carry more viruses. Lifespan was a stronger predictor of DNA viral diversity, while group size and family were more important for RNA viruses, patterns that may reflect broad differences in infection duration. Finally, we identify 55 bat species not currently considered reservoirs that are most likely to carry viruses. Mapping these predictions highlights global regions that could be targeted for disease surveillance, including those with few bat species but a large proportion of predicted carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDRYADFrench-language works237,207