Number, Size Composition and Food of Larval and Juvenile Fish Caught with a Two-Boat Surface Trawl in the Strait of Georgia and Saanich Inlet, 1968-1973
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the Fraser Plume Study that began in the 1960s, larval and juvenile fishes were caught by a trawl net towed between two boats in the Strait of Georgia during spring and summer from 1966 to 1969 and in 1973. While the data obtained from sampling in 1966 and 1967 were published in the Manuscript Report Series of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, none of the data collected in 1968, 1969 and 1973 were published. A volunteer effort led to the resurrection of these data from magnetic tapes, formerly stored in the electronic archives of the Pacific Biological Station. The data included station locations, times and dates, sampling effort, fish catches, lengths and body weights of individual fish taken from subsamples of the catch. Quantitative measures of diet, total stomach contents, prey species identification and prey size were available only for the first cruise in 1968 whereas stomach content data for 1966 and 1967 had been published shortly after they were collected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".