MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910986583 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406210

Scipopus (Parascipopus) tico Lindsay & Marshall 2023, subgen. et sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6910986583 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Geology in Latin America and Caribbean
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeParatypeSetaNymphalidaeTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Parascipopus) tico subgen. et sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 0AB771B4-EE45-45D7-93DE-089F9420E16F Fig. 45 Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Parascipopus) tico sp. nov. resembles S. (Pa.) zadbi in having a primarily dark brown or black body with a blue sheen but it differs by the at least partially white first fore tarsomere. Etymology The name is a noun in apposition derived from the idiomatic term for a native of Costa Rica. Type material examined Holotype COSTA RICA • 1 ♂; Prov. San José, P.N. Chirripó, Pérez Zeledón, Cementerio de la Máquina; 1900 m a.s.l.; 2 Feb. 2001; M. Alfuro leg.; manual; INBIO0003330662/MYCRO580-19 sequenced for CO1; MNCR (photographed, Fig. 45D–E). Paratype COSTA RICA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; L_S_378500_513200 #63191; MNCR (dissected and photographed, Fig. 45A–C). Description LENGTH. 11 – 12 mm. HEAD. Antenna dark orange and/or black. Palpus dark brown, pale brown apically, pale microtrichose and setulose, wide (length 3.8× height). Clypeus light to dark brown, darker brown or black medially, width ~1.9 × height, silvery microtrichose on entire surface. Frontal vitta dark orange, microtrichose, posterior apex strongly tapered to a point. Orbital plate dark brown, shiny, bare. Epicephalon black-brown, shiny, bare, wide (width>⅔ upper frontal vitta width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Paracephalon black-brown. One lower fronto-orbital seta, outer vertical seta and upper fronto-orbital seta absent, all other head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum black-brown, dark brown microtrichose, silvery blue sheen medially. Female cervical sclerite convex. Postpronotal lobe black-brown, setulose anteriorly. Notopleuron black-brown. Pleuron black-brown with blue sheen, entirely covered in silvery microtrichosity, denser on posterior corner of katepisternum and extending anterodorsally to form silvery transverse band only seen at some angles. Legs dark brown or black, mid and hind femora paler brown basally. Fore tarsomere 1 almost entirely white; hind tarsomere 1 dark brown or black with ventral golden fringe. Wing mostly hyaline with slight brown infuscation on apex and anterior margin. Apical scutellar seta absent. ABDOMEN (J+ ♀). T1 with fine, long, white or pale brown setae. FEMALE ABDOMEN. Pleuron pale grey, microtrichose, P1 and dorsal half of P2–6 dark brown. T1+2 ~3.0 × length of T3. Oviscape black-brown, setulose, microtrichosity not observed (not visible in dissection), ~3.0× length of T6. Common duct short, ⅓ of entire duct length. Paired spermathecal duct short (5.0 × length of paired spermathecae), tapered medially, swollen apically. Paired spermathecal stems slightly sinuate, longer than spermathecae. Paired spermathecae nearly ovoid, slightly constricted distally, with apical indentation. Single spermathecal duct arising from base of paired duct, narrow, ½ diameter of base of paired duct. Single spermatheca elongate, wider distally, with median swollen process. MALE ABDOMEN. Pleuron of available male discoloured. T1+2 ~3.0 × length of T3. T6 short, genital fork 3.0× as long as T6, with arms converging, inner basal process straight, ½ the length of arms. Epandrium elongate (length ~2.0 × height), densely setose on posteroventral margin. Male terminalia not dissected and internal characters are thus not available for description. Distribution Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicBotany and Geology in Latin America and CaribbeanFrench-language works237,207