MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6910990436 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10687874

Drosophila alabamensis Sturtevant 1918

2018· article· en· W6910990436 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedicelSetaSternumApex (geometry)OvipositorThorax (insect anatomy)LobeWing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drosophila alabamensis Sturtevant, 1918a: 38. DIAGNOSIS: Dark grayish-brown, pollinose fly with faint stripes on scutum; pleuron dark brown with diffuse, light, longitudinal stripe through middle; coloration not sexually dimorphic. Anterior reclinate seta lateral to slightly anterolateral to proclinate; cheek relatively deep (CD/ED 0.25); basal flagellomere without long setulae; wing long (ThL/WL 0.40), slightly dusky, with minute costal lappet at apex of Sc cell; abdomen mostly dark brown with some faint markings. Female: oviscapt heavily sclerotized, unique among North American species, with three posterodorsal pegs on peduncles. Male: hypandrium nearly square; aedeagus short, bulbous, scaled, sclerotized. DESCRIPTION: Coloration: Little or no sexual dimorphism. Head mostly dull gray with some light areas; ocellar triangle and frontal vittae velvety black-brown, fronto-orbital plates slightly lighter, dull gray-brown; anterior edge of frons yellowish; cheek mostly light, with brown area around and above vibrissa; face dull yellow-brown; antennal pedicel and basal flagellomere light brown; clypeus and palps dark brown. Eyes brick red. Thorax dull gray-brown; scutum pollinose, with three complete, faint, lighter stripes (in line with dorsocentrals and in middle), pair of incomplete faint stripes just above notopleuron on posterior part of scutum; rim of scutellum slightly lighter than disk; postpronotal lobe dark yellowish; pleuron mostly dark brown, with diffuse, light, longitudinal stripe in middle running entire length of thorax. Wing slightly dusky, no markings except for small dark spot on veins at Sc break; halter light dusky brown, with darker spots on stem. Legs light dusky brown. Abdomen mostly dark brown, with lighter area on tergite 2 (in middle, triangular), and on anterolateral portions of tergites 4–6; small light patch on each of tergites 2–5 near lateral margin (decreasing in size caudad). Tergite 8 and proctiger in female slightly lighter. Head: Frons, face, cheek, scape slightly pollinose. Antenna: Pedicel and scape setose; basal flagellomere with minute, light setulae; arista with relatively short branches, 4 dorsal, 1 ventral branch (midway between apical fork and last dorsal branch). Eye shape irregular in lateral view, interfacetal setulae dense and short. Face: slightly concave; carina low, narrow, on upper 2/3 of face. Vibrissa well differentiated, one pair, subvibrissal setae much smaller. Frons: Fronto-orbital plates slightly shiny. Fronto-orbital setae: proclinate approximately same length as posterior reclinate; anterior reclinate about 1/2 the size, directly lateral to slightly anterolateral to proclinate; posterior reclinate slightly closer to proclinate than to verticals. Ocellar seta between anterior and posterior ocelli, approximately same size as proclinate; postocellar setae convergent. Inner vertical seta slightly thicker and shorter than outer vertical. Palp flat, apex rounded; proboscis short, when retracted barely protruding beyond oral margin. Head measurements (N = 4): CD/ED 0.25 (0.16–0.38), ED/EW 1.19 (1.02–1.28), FD/FW 0.99 (0.94–1.06), FL/LFW 0.88 (0.82–0.94), HW/ HD 1.46 (1.42–1.50), Ocellar S-index 1.22 (1.11– 1.40), OR1/OR3 0.88 (0.80–1.00), OR2/OR1 0.64 (0.63–0.66), VT-index 1.06 (1.04–1.09). Thorax: Acrostichal setulae in 4–6 irregular rows; acrostichals anterior to dorsocentrals not enlarged. Anterior dorsocentral slightly shorter than posterior dorsocentral. Postpronotum with 2 setae; 3 long notopleural setae, forming triangle; 1 long, 1 short prealar; 1 long supraalar. Anterior scutellars parallel, posterior (apical) scutellars crossing at tips. Anterior katepisternal very short, 0.3× length of posterior katepisternal. Legs: Profemur with ventral row 4 long setae (lengths slightly greater than femur width), lateral row of 4 slightly shorter ones; male protarsus with setulae semi-erect. Mesotibia with ventroapical setae; metatibia with preapical dorsal seta. Wing: C just before Sc break slightly thickened and darkened, Sc break incised, forming minute lappet. Thorax and wing measurements: 4-V index 2.33 (2.22–2.45), 5-X index 2.84 (2.61–2.93), C-index 2.22 (2.14–2.28), DC-index 0.66 (0.62– 0.71), hb-index 1.89 (1.76–2.13), S-index 0.49 (0.48–0.50), ThL 0.96 mm (0.93–1.01), ThL/WL 0.40 (0.39–0.43), WL/WW 2.19 (2.09–2.33). Male Terminalia: Epandrium taller than wide, with microtrichia overall except ventral lobes; no setae dorsally (lateral surfaces only); ventral lobe of epandrium short, apex not reaching to level of surstylus apex, with lateral row 5–6 setae. Cercus less sclerotized than epandrium; not connected to epandrium; ventral margin flat, with fine setulae, no ventral lobe. Surstylus sclerotized, pendulous, without additional lobe; approximately 30 prensisetae (ca. 13 pegs, including dorsomedial row of 6 pegs, dorsolateral row of 5–6 pegs); thinner, longer prensisetae medially and at apex. Subepandrial sclerite heavily sclerotized, articulating laterally with bases of surstyli, curved in middle. Hypandrium nearly square, with slightly concave anterior margin; postgonites with microtrichia. Aedeagus short, stout, heavily sclerotized, scaled (mostly on lateral and dorsal surfaces). Aedeagal apodeme short, slightly shorter than aedeagus. Female Terminalia: Oviscapt heavily sclerotized, with row of 3 posterodorsal pegs on peduncles; row of apical 6 pegs forming flat, horizontal row beneath pedunculate pegs; row of ca. 6 minute pegs on ventral margin of oviscapt. Oviprovector scaled, but scales relatively small and sparse. Spermatheca heavily sclerotized, dome shaped, introvert extended about 3/4 into length of capsule. TYPE: Holotype, female. USA: Alabama, Kushla, IV-9-15, A.H. Sturtevant, Ac. [accession] 5151, holotype, handwritten id label “ Drosophila alabamensis Sturtevant. ” In AMNH. Specimen is missing part of left wing and is somewhat shriveled; not dissected. OTHER SPECIMENS EXAMINED: CANADA: Ontario: Algonquin Park, summer, 1956, D.D. Miller, 1♂ (dissected, no. 15) (AMNH). USA: Illinois: Carlinville, Marshall R. Wheeler, 9-5-52, 1♀ (AMNH), Aug. 23, 1954, 1♀, 1♂ (dissected, no. 17) (AMNH); Equality, IX /11/52 [no collector), 1♀, 1♂ (dissected, no. 16). Missouri: Lithium, Je 29, 1955, M.R. Wheeler, 2♀ (AMNH). Nebraska: 3 slides, labelled “ D. cinerea -? Nebraska [specific locality not given], male...MW [Marshall R. Wheeler],” one slide of the head, one of the genitalia, a third of the wing, all presumably of the same specimen. New York: Brainard, Rensselaer Co., July 11–22, 1966, P. & B. Wygodzinsky, 1♀ (AMNH). Texas: Austin, Oct. 14, 1950, M.R. Wheeler, 2086.12, 2♀ (AMNH); Oct. 25, 1950, M.R. Wheeler, 2♀ (1 dissected, no. 79), 1 ♂ (dissected, no. 18) (AMNH); 21 Nov. 1953 M.R. Wheeler, 1♀ (AMNH). Virginia: Montgomery Co., IV/15 /52, M. Levitan, 1♀ (AMNH). COMMENTS: Male genitalia of the slidemounted Nebraska specimen unmistakably show the specimen is H. alabamensis. Also, see comments under H. cinerea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207