Hubungan Self-esteem Dengan Quarter Life Crisis Pada Dewasa Awal di Lingkungan Hamparan Perak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riset ini bertujuan guna mengetahui hubungan self-esteem dengan quarter life crisis pada dewasa awal di lingkungan Hamparan Perak. Riset ini menggunakan metode Kuantitatif, subjek riset ini ialah individu dewasa awal di lingkungan Hamparan Perak. Jumlah sampel dalam riset ini sebanyak 100 individu dewasa awal. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam riset ini menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data menggunakan skala likert, dimana terdapat skala Self-esteem dan skala Quarter Life Crisis. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik Korelasi Product Moment. Berdasarkan hasil analisis korelasi product moment menunjukkan adanya hubungan negatif antara self-esteem dan quarter life crisis, (𝑟𝑥𝑦) sebesar = -0,731 dengan signifikasi p=0,000 (p0,05), artinya hipotesis riset diterima yaitu ada hubungan negatif. Koefisien determinan (𝑟2) yang memiliki nilai 0,535 atau setara dengan 53,5% maka self-esteem memberikan kontribusi sebesar 53,5% terhadap quarter life crisis, sedangkan 46,5% sisanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor lain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".