MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911013135 · doi:10.5061/dryad.6q573n61f

TRPM8 thermosensation in ectotherms mediates both skin colour and locomotor performance responses to cold temperature

2022· dataset· en· W6911013135 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRPM8ThermoreceptorThermoregulationTransient receptor potential channelXenopusEctothermAgonistAntagonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermoregulation is a homeostatic process to maintain an organism’s internal temperature within a physiological range compatible with life. In ectotherms, body temperature fluctuates with that of the environment, with both physiological and behavioral responses employed to modify body temperature. Changing skin colour/reflectance and locomotor activity are both well-recognized temperature regulatory mechanisms, but little is known of the participating thermosensor/s. We find that Xenopus laevis tadpoles put in the cold exhibit a temperature-dependent and rapid melanosome aggregation in melanophores, which lightens the skin. To identify the cold-sensor, we focused on transient receptor potential (trp) channel genes from group 1 (TRPA, TRPM, TRPV and TRPC families). Of particular interest were TRPM family members, known as cold sensors. mRNAs for several TRPMs are present in Xenopus tails, and TRPM8 protein is present in skin melanophores. Temperature-induced melanosome aggregation is mimicked by the Trpm8 agonist menthol (WS12) and blocked by the Trpm8 antagonist PF05105679. The degree of skin lightening induced by cooling or the WS12 TRPM8 agonist correlates with the extent of alterations in locomotor performance. We propose that TRPM8 serves as a cool thermosensor in ectotherms that helps coordinate skin lightening and behavioural locomotor performance as adaptive thermoregulatory responses to cold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→