Dienerian (Early Triassic) ammonoids from Spiti, Himachal Pradesh, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction The Northern Indian Margin is known since the end of the 19th century as a classical region for the study of Early Triassic ammonoid faunas. In a companion work (Ware et al. 2018), Dienerian ammonoids of the Salt Range (Pakistan) were thoroughly revised. A new high resolution biostratigraphical scheme was proposed for the Salt Range and correlation with other recently established biozonations (Tozer 1994 for Arctic Canada; Dagys & Ermakova 1996 for northern Siberia; Shigeta & Zakharov 2009 for Primorye, Russia) was discussed. The Spiti region (Himachal Pradesh, India) is a classical area for studying Early Triassic ammonoids of the Northern Indian Margin. Ammonites were described in two monographs first by Diener (1897) followed by von Krafft & Diener (1909). These two pioneering works unfortunately lack a detailed stratigraphic context, and many new species are only indicated as coming from the ‘lower division of the lower Trias’, a very vague indication, which does not provide the basis for an accurate and precise biozonation. Until very recently, no other papers concerning Early Triassic ammonoids from Spiti have been published. In the mid-1990s, Leopold Krystyn started the investigation of various sections in Spiti, which led him to propose a section near Mud as a Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) candidate for the Induan–Olenekian boundary (equivalent to the Dienerian–Smithian boundary; Krystyn et al. 2007a, b). Only a few ammonoids were illustrated and described in these studies, as the focus was on the boundary interval. After the work in India by Krystyn et al. (2007a,b) the research group at the University of Z€urich conducted two intensive seasons of fieldwork in 2008 and 2009. This lead to the discovery of typical Smithian ammonoids below the boundary (Br€uhwiler et al. 2010) proposed by Krystyn et al. (2007a,b), thus questioning the proposed definition of the Induan–Olenekian boundary (see the foreword, Ware & Bucher 2018a for details). Recently, Br€uhwiler et al. (2012) revised and described the middle and upper Smithian ammonoids from Spiti district. The present work focuses on the abundant and fairly well preserved ammonoid faunas from a detailed bedrock controlled sampling in the Mud, Guling and Lalung areas of the Spiti District. The great similarity with the Salt Range, Pakistan, allows the authors to establish a detailed and laterally reproducible but informal biozonation for the Dienerian of the Northern Indian Margin. Based on these results, a formal biozonation for the Northern Indian Margin was constructed by Ware et al (2015).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".