Bibliographic record
Abstract
176. Silusa langori Klimaszewski (Figs. 10a – h), Table 1 References. Klimaszewski et al. 2003, 2018. Webster et al. 2012. Redescription of female. Externally similar to male. Tergite VIII transverse, apical margin arcuate, antecostsal suture strongly sinuate medially (Fig. 10f); sternite VIII transverse, apical margin arcuate, antecostsal suture slightly sinuate (Fig. 10g); spermatheca with globose capsule and narrow stem (Fig. 10h). Previously published image of female spermatheca is an error (Klimaszewski et al. 2003, 2018). Distribution. Nearctic. Canada:AB, NB. USA (NCR): NH (NSR). Collection and Habitat data. The NH specimens were captured from May to September in litter by a stream and by flight intercept traps. Most specimens were taken at sites close to the NH border with Quebec. In Canada (NB) taken by Lindgren funnel traps in an old red pine forest, an old-growth white spruce and balsam fir forest, and with an aerial (butterfly) net during the evening in a mixed forest opening (Webster et al. 2012). In AB adults were collected by various kinds of traps in a 130+ year-old boreal forest comprised mainly of trembling aspen, birch, and eastern balsam poplar, in an 85-year-old boreal mixed-wood stand comprised mainly of trembling aspen and eastern balsam poplar, and in a 70-year-old boreal mixed-wood stand comprised mainly of trembling aspen and Salix (Klimaszewski et al. 2018). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Coos Co.: 1 mi NE East Inlet Dam, 10–26.V.1986, 1 male; 12–24.VI.1986, D.S. Chandler, FIT, 2 males. Norton Pool, 3 mi NE East Inlet Dam, 9–26.V.1986, 1 male, 1 female; 10–24.VII.1986, D.S. Chandler, FIT, 1 male. 17 km S Gorham, Glen Ellis Falls, 1900’, 8.IX.1987, J.M. Campbell and A. Davies, sifting litter by stream (CNC), 1 female.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".