SNP amplicons results of 50 hybrid Chinook-Coho salmon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
These SNP panel results confirm the hybrid origin in 50 Chinook-Coho Salmon individuals. The SNP panel is composed of two amplicons and five diagnostic SNPs. DNA amplicons OkiOts_120255 and Oki_RAD41030 have SNP sites fixed for alternate base pairs in Chinook and Coho salmon (Beacham and Wallace 2019). The panel examined genotypes at one diagnostic position in OkiOts_120255 SNP: 113 (Reference=A, Variant=C) and four positions in Oki_RAD41030: 45 (TC), 51(CG), 195 (GA), and 198 (TG) called via Proton software Variant Caller®. The hybrid salmon were heterozygous for a Chinook and Coho haplotype at both SNP loci, confirming these as the parental species involved in the hybridization and consistent with all being F1 or higher order (F2 or back-cross) hybrid individuals. Beacham, T. D. & Wallace, C. G. (2019). Salmon species identification via direct DNA sequencing of single amplicons. Conservation Genetics Resources, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-o19-01102-1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".