Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4. Acrotaphus wiltii (Cresson, 1870) Epimecis wiltii Cresson 1870: 143 [♀ (ANSP), USA, Ohio]. References. Shannon 1913 [Epimecis; USA (Virginia); host]. Morley 1914: 8 [Epimecis; misdet. (see Gauld 1991: 333)]. Cresson 1916: 63 [lectotype ♀ (ANSP) designated; USA, Ohio]. Cushman 1920: 17 [Hymenoepimecis; USA (many localities); host], Plate 2. Townes 1944: 55 [catalogue; Hymenoepimecis]. Townes & Townes 1960: 257 [Acrotaphus (comb.); description; Canada, eastern and southeastern USA (to Florida and Texas)]. Gordh 1971 [USA (Kansas); host]. Carlson 1979: 337 [catalogue]. Brambila & Porter 2005: 152 [USA; host]. Pádua et al. 2020a: 56 [description; USA]. Remarks. Record of this species by Morley (1914: 8) actually belongs to A. tibialis (Gauld 1991: 333). Material examined. MEXICO. Veracruz: 1 ♀ (UNAM) NE of San Andrés Tuxtla, Biological Station Los Tuxtlas, 26.vi.1989, coll. M.A. Perez. Distribution. Canada, USA (from Florida north to Quebec and west to Manitoba, Kansas and Texas), Mexico (Veracruz). First record from Mexico. Biology. Reared from the orb weaving spider Neoscona arabesca (Walckenaer) (= Epeira trivittata Keyserling) (Araneidae) in Virginia and Kansas, USA (Shannon 1913; Gordh 1971; Brambila & Porter 2005). Some specimens were collected at light.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it