MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911046886 · doi:10.5114/amsik.2013.46123

Sprawozdanie z 91 Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rechtsmedizin w Freiburgu (Fryburgu) w Niemczech

2014· article· pl· W6911046886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2014
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical and Health Sciences Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime lineQueen (butterfly)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W dniach 18-22.09.2012 roku odbył się w sercu Schwarzwaldu, Freiburgu, mieście o bardzo bogatej historii coroczny, tym razem, 91. Kongres Medycyny Prawnej – przy udziale ministra sprawiedliwości kraju związkowego Badenii-Wirtembergii – Rainera Stickelbergera, rektora uniwersytetu Alberta Ludwiga we Freiburgu – prof. Hansa Jochena Schiewera, dziekana wydziału lekarskiego – prof. Huberta Bluma oraz prezydenta Kongresu i Niemieckiego Towarzystwa Medycyny Prawnej – prof. Stefana Pollaka.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.419
GPT teacher head0.653
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicMedical and Health Sciences ResearchFrench-language works237,207