Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orchestomerus Dietz, 1896 Orchestomerus Dietz 1896: 412. Type species: Orchestomerus wickhami Dietz 1896, subsequent designation by Colonnelli 1991. Diagnosis. Orchestomerus is characterized mainly by having a pair of carinate or obtuse prominences on the middle of the pronotum, edentate femora, tibiae with shallow grooves and lacking definite angles basally on outer margins, mesosternal canal that is limited laterally by oblique, apically narrowed costae, and transverse impressions on the sides of abdominal ventrite 5 laterally along the basal margin. The genus is very similar in general appearance to Craponius LeConte, 1876 known from the Nearctic Region. However, Craponius has the tibiae deeply grooved and emarginate along the outer margin for reception of the tarsi, the fore and middle tibiae have basally sharply angulate outer margins, the mesosternal canal is limited laterally by subparallel costae, and abdominal ventrite 5 lacks lateral impressions. Orchestomerus also closely resembles Hypocoeliodes Faust, 1896, but Hypocoeliodes possesses dentate femora and abdominal ventrite 5 lacks lateral impressions. Distribution. Nearctic and Neotropical Regions (Colonnelli 2004). Natural History. Our knowledge of the biology of Orchestomerus weevils is still limited, but available data suggest that they are associated with plants in the family Vitaceae (Korotyaev and Anderson 2002; Colonnelli 2004; Eiseman 2014).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".