Bibliographic record
Abstract
26. Acalypha leandrii I.Montero & Cardiel PhytoKeys 140: 61 (Montero Muñoz et al. 2020b). — Type: Madagascar. Reg. Melaky [Prov. Mahajanga], Antsalova, vers Ambodiriana (E. d’Antsalova), 18°40’0.12”S, 44°43’59.879”E, 100-150 m, 06.XII.1952, J. Leandri, R. Capuron & A. Razafindrakoto 2037 (holo-, P [P05547059]). — Paratypes: Madagascar. Reg. Melaky [Prov. Mahajanga], calcaires de l’Antsingy, vers Andobo (E. d’Antsalova), en remontant vers Tsiandro, 18°40’0.12”S, 44°43’59.879”E, 5-8. II.1960, 300 m, J. Leandri & P. Saboureau 2996 (K, MO [MO-3025001], P [P00324506, P05543680], TAN); J. Leandri & P. Saboureau 3016 (G!, MO [MO-2966304], P [P05547274]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Montero Muñoz et al. (2020b); Fig. 46F. ETYMOLOGY. — The epithet honors French botanist Jacques Désiré Leandri (1903-1982). DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Melaky). Dry deciduous forest. On Mesozoic limestone. Altitudinal range 100-400 m (Fig. 44). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha leandrii is known from four collections from the Tsingy de Bemaraha. Its EOO could not be calculated; its AOO is estimated to be 8 km 2 (see assessment of A. cardielii). No specimens of this species have been collected for 60 years, so we cannot rule out that this species has become extinct. Due to habitat loss, the restricted geographic range, and the absence of recent collections, A. leandrii is assigned a preliminary conservation status of Critically Endangered: CR B2ab(ii,iii), probably extinct (EX). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 4 collections. Madagascar. Leandri, J. 2037 (P[P05547059]), 2996 (K, MO[MO-3025001], P[P00324506, P05543680], TAN), 3016 (G, MO[MO-2966304], P[P05547274]); Keraudren-Aymonin, M. 511 (P[P04779527]). DESCRIPTION Herbs or sprawling subshrubs, probably evergreen, height unknown, probably dioecious. Branches densely pubescent with simple, short, curved, antrorse trichomes, glabrous when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 2 × 1 mm, perulate, perules 2, valvate, membranous, light brown, pubescent with simple, short trichomes. Stipules to 7 mm long, oblong-lanceolate, midrib prominent, margins scarious, midrib appressed-pubescent, margin ciliate with thin simple trichomes mixed with minute glands. Petioles 2-8 cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches, glabrescent. Leaf blades 8-12 × (3.5-) 4.5-9 cm, broadly ovate-lanceolate, membranous; base rounded to cordate; apex acuminate to caudate, acumen to 25 mm long, acute, mucronate; margins serrate, teeth acute, slightly callose-edged; upper and lower surfaces laxly pubescent with simple, erect trichomes, and with short, curved, antrorse trichomes on veins; venation prominent in both surfaces, actinodromous, basal veins 3 or 5, secondary veins 7-9 per side. Stipels triangular, to 0.7 mm long, margin ciliate and with glandular trichomes. Inflorescences spiciform, unisexual, axillary. Male inflorescences to 8 cm long; peduncle to 20 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches; flowers glomerate; bracts to 1 mm long, lanceolate, margin ciliate and with sessile glands. Female inflorescences to 8.5 cm long; peduncle to 25 mm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches; bracts to 18, sessile, enlarging in fruit to 6 × 12 mm, subreniform, with prominent veins on upper surface, laxly pubescent with simple, erect trichomes and thick glandular trichomes to 1 mm long, margin entire; bracteoles absent. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.5 mm long, sparsely hairy; buds to 0.7 mm diameter, glabrous, papillose. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 1 mm long, oblong-lanceolate, ciliate with simple, erect trichomes to 0.5 mm long; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, apparently smooth, surface densely hispid; styles 3, to 5 mm long, slightly connate at base, glabrous, each divided into 5 segments. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 3 mm diameter, papillose-hispid, papillae to 0.5 mm long, ending in simple, erect trichome to 1 mm long, surface glabrous. Seeds pyriform 2 × 1.6 mm, minutely foveolate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".