Bibliographic record
Abstract
234. Parocyusa fuliginosa (Casey) (= Chilopora fuliginosa Casey) (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2018), Table 1 References. Casey 1906. Moore and Legner 1975. Seevers 1978. Klimaszewski et al. 2011, 2016d,e, 2018, 2021. Brunke et al. 2012, 2021. Webster et al. 2016. Assing 2021 (as Parocyusa). Chatzimanolis et al. 2020. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: LB, NB, ON, SK. USA: GA, MA, NC, NH (NSR), PA, TN. Collection and Habitat data. All NH specimens but one were collected at an old-growth silver maple floodplain forest, and were taken by sifting forest litter, old river drift, rotten boxelder logs, and from a flight intercept trap. The other specimen was taken from leaf litter along a stream. Collected from May to November. In Canada found under rocks and gravel along a stream margin; in NB one specimen was collected by splashing the gravel margin of a clear rocky stream (Webster et al. 2016). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Grafton Co.: Bedell Bridge S. P. @ Oliverian Brook, Haverhill, 2.X.1991, D.S. Chandler, sift forest litter, 2 females; 2.X.1991, D.S. Chandler, sift litter by stream, 1 female; 2.X.1991, S.T. O’Keefe, sift forest litter, 1 female. Bedell Bridge State Park @ Oliverian Brook, 29.IX.1982, D.S. Chandler, berlese boxelder logs, 1 female; 7–24.V.1992, D.S. Chandler, FITrap, 1 sex?; 14.VII.1992, sift old river drift, D.S. Chandler, 1 male, 2 females; 26.VIII.1992, berlese old river drift, D.S. Chandler, 2 males, 2 females. Merrimack Co.: 1 mi E Concord, Concord Airport, CZ-4a, 15.XI.2001, oak-pine barrens, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter along stream, 1 female.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Other design | high |
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".