İzmir Arkeoloji Müzesi'nden Bir Grup Anadolu-Frig Tipi Fibula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibulae first appeared at the end of the Late Bronze Age. For a long time, the scientific world was puzzled by the question of where and when they first appeared. Today’s research and studies show that the product in question appeared in south-eastern Europe in the last quarter of the 2nd millennium BC, spread to the Mediterranean basin with waves of migration, and suddenly, different types of products appeared in different geographical areas. Fibulae, at first functional, served as a means of fastening clothing; however, their meaning and use changed over time. Fibulae, which Muscarella likens to “social identity cards” in the Iron Age, have indeed become a significant source of data for the distinction of nations in the Iron Age Mediterranean world, which is in the process of globalisation. It is well known that fibulae, which were associated with men in the Eastern world and with women in the West and which were transformed over time from an ornament to an object of prestige, acquired religious significance thanks to the thousands of fibulae that were presented as votive offerings in Aegean-Mediterranean temples and sanctuaries. A small group of fibulae in the Izmir Archaeological Museum is the subject of this study. The small group, which is to be introduced as an important subtype, consists of examples known in the literature as the Anatolian-Phrygian type. They belong to four subgroups of Type XII in the typology and are generally compatible with Western Anatolian examples dating between the 8th and 6th centuries BCE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".