MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911286400 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406249

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) noturgidus Lindsay & Marshall 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6911286400 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeParatypeRothschildChaetotaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) noturgidus sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3E98F6BE-0B52-44AA-BEF3-14A58CD7409E Fig. 64 Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) noturgidus sp. nov. resembles S. (Ph.) turgidus sp. nov., S. (Ph.) argentum sp. nov. and S. (Ph.) zeta in having a brown first fore tarsomere and brown infuscate wing, but differs by the short anterior face of the clypeus (width 2.0× height), the brown first hind tarsomere, the black-brown scutum and the absent postocellar seta. The female terminalia of S. (Ph.) noturgidus are nearly identical to those of S. (Ph.) heteropus, but S. (Ph.) noturgidus differs externally by the orange epicephalon and paracephalon, and the relatively uniform dark brown or black legs. Etymology This species was named by adding a prefix to the superficially similar S. (Phaeopterina) turgidus sp. nov. Type material examined Holotype COLOMBIA • 1 ♀; Amazonas, PNN Amacayacu Matamata; 3°23′ S, 70°06′ W; 150 m a.s.l.; 17 Sep.–1 Oct. 2001; D. Chota leg.; Malaise; M. 2239; debu01089017/MYCRO569-19 sequenced for CO1; IAVH (photographed, Fig. 64A–B, D). Paratype COLOMBIA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; debu01089021/MYCRO604-19 sequenced for CO1–5′; IAVH (dissected and photographed, Fig. 64C). Description LENGTH. 15 mm. HEAD. Palpus orange, pale microtrichose and black setulose, narrow (length 4.5 × height), apex pointed. Clypeus orange, width ~2.5× height, silvery microtrichose on entire surface. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose. Epicephalon orange and/or light brown, shiny, bare, wide (width ⅔ or more of upper frontal vittal width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Anterior lower fronto-orbital seta and postocellar seta absent, all other head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum black-brown with a wide, silvery blue median sheen. Female cervical sclerite relatively flat. Postpronotal lobe black-brown, some setulae on outer lateral margin. Notopleuron black-brown with indistinct pale microtrichosity surrounding anterior notopleural seta and on ventral margin. Thorax black-brown with blue sheen, entirely silvery microtrichose. Legs dark brown, mid and hind femur light brown basally, gradually fading to dark brown apically. Fore and hind tarsomere 1 dark brown with ventral golden fringe. Wing entirely brown infuscate. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1 with fine, long, white setae. Pleuron pale grey, dorsal half of P2 dark brown, dorsal half of P3–5 dark grey (Fig. 64C). T1+2 ~2.0× length of T3; posterior margin of T2 ~1.3× as wide as T1. Oviscape dark brown, black setulose, white microtrichose on anterior ⅓, ~2.5× length of T6. Spermathecal complex with two paired ducts arising separately from bursa copulatrix, each duct narrow, parallel-sided with apical bulb-like swelling. Paired spermathecal stems elongate, slightly sinuate, longer than spermathecae. Paired spermathecae elongate, nearly almond-shaped; one pair with flat, invaginated apices, the other pair with pointed projections arising from apical invaginations. Both spermathecal ducts and all four spermathecae similar in size and shape. MALE ABDOMEN. Not observed. Distribution Colombia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207