MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911287676 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10531936

On Studying the Prospective Road Construction Materials Demand for 50 Years

2022· article· en· W6911287676 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationWork (physics)Road constructionCover (algebra)Highway maintenancePopulation growthNatural (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Global road networks play a huge role in social development, economic growth, and easy access to natural resources. In today's world, road transportation carries more than 80% of passengers. The world’s population is expected to grow to 9.8 billion by 2050, and half of the anticipated growth in the world population will be in Africa. In the development of economic activity, the demand for people and goods transportation is a prime indicator of changing demographics. As of 2021, there are 6,958,538 million people living in Libya. According to current estimates, the Libyan population will be more than 10.8 million by 2050. The road mesh was 83,200 km in 2010. By 2050, Libya's road network is expected to increase by at least double its current length, which is 95,180 km of paved roads. In this study, the potential future paved road network is estimated, as well as the expected amount of material to be used for road construction. On typical pavement construction layers in Libya, at least 249,847,500 m3 of materials will be needed to construct new roads over the next 50 years. In addition, the country will require a significant amount of materials to cover the road maintenance and rehabilitation work required during t3hat same period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207