MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911296229 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406224

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) brunneus Lindsay & Marshall 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6911296229 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeChaetotaxyAedeagusAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) brunneus sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3149FBAA-7D1D-4BAA-9087-0736F284E7B8 Fig. 50 Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) brunneus sp. nov. resembles S. (Ph.) sexguttatus and S. (Ph.) musculosus sp. nov. in having three subapical hyaline spots on the wing and a mostly white first fore tarsomere. Scipopus (Ph.) brunneus can be differentiated from these by its dark brown clypeus, antenna and parafacial. Etymology The species name, from the Latin noun for ‘brown’, refers to the brown parafacial and clypeus of this species. Type material examined Holotype COLOMBIA • 1 ♀; Caqueta San José de Fragua R Yuruyaco; 1°20′55″ N, 76°06′11″ W; 1300 m a.s.l.; 9–13 Sep. 2000; E. Gonzalez leg.; Malaise 5; debu 01089018/MYCRO600-19 sequenced for CO1–5′, CO1–3′, 12S, 28S; IAVH (dissected and photographed, Fig. 50A–D). Description LENGTH. 12 mm. HEAD. Palpus light brown, darker apically, entirely pale microtrichose and setulose on ventral margin, narrow (length 5.3× height). Antenna and parafacial dark brown in ground colour, white microtrichose. Clypeus dark brown, width ~2.0× height, silvery microtrichose on entire surface, denser in posterolateral corners. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose, strongly tapered posteriorly. Orbital plate orange, microtrichose, bare and slightly shiny on lateral edges. Epicephalon light brown, shiny, white microtrichose except bare anteriorly, wide (width ⅔ or more of upper frontal vitta width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Postocellar seta absent; all other head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum black-brown with wide, blue median sheen. Postpronotal lobe black-brown, densely setulose on anterior half. Notopleuron black-brown, pale brown microtrichose ventromedially and posteriorly. Female cervical sclerite very slightly swollen posteriorly. Pleuron dark brown with blue sheen, completely silvery microtrichose but denser posteriorly, forming silvery transverse band. Legs dark brown; fore tarsomere 1 almost entirely white; hind tarsomere 1 pale basally, with ventral white fringe. Wing brown-black infuscate on r 1, distal ½ and apex, three hyaline window-like spots in m 1, r 2+3, r 3+4. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1 with fine, long, dark brown setae. Pleuron off-white, dorsal quarter of P3–5 dark brown. T1+2 ~2.0× length of T3; posterior margin of T2 ~1.6× as wide as T1. Oviscape dark brown, darker apically, anterior ⅔ white microtrichose, ~3.0× length of T6. Common duct very short, smooth, ventral receptacle apparently originating from duct. Paired spermathecal duct (duct leading to large paired spermathecae) arising from bursa, long (>10.0 × length of paired spermathecae), mostly parallel-sided but very swollen distally. Paired spermathecal stems with very short, narrow, basal section and long, bulbous, swollen distal section (Fig 50C). Paired spermathecae nearly spherical, sparsely tuberculate especially near base. “Single” spermathecal duct (smaller spermathecal duct, in this case leading to two small spermathecae) short and narrow, ½ diameter and>½ length of paired duct, arising from base of paired duct, terminating in pair of elongate, bulbous and distally rounded spermathecae. MALE ABDOMEN. Unknown. Remarks See S. (Ph.) musculosus sp. nov. for discussion. Distribution Colombia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207