MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911314737 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10247373

Oxypoda nigriceps Casey 1893

2023· article· en· W6911314737 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwampLitterPlant litterAlderMarshBracken

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

225. Oxypoda nigriceps Casey (Illustrations in Klimaszewski et al. 2006, 2018), Table 1 References. Casey 1893. Klimaszewski et al. 2005a, 2006, 2018. Majka and Sikes 2009. Distribution. Nearctic. Canada: NB, NS. USA: NH (NSR), RI, VA. Collection and Habitat data. The NH specimens were found in sod, litter by marsh, litter along swamp margin, and in an old beaver pond area. Collected from April to October. In Canada recorded from various forest types and wetlands, usually in leaf litter. In mature red spruce and eastern white cedar forest in moss and litter near small brook, in red spruce dominated forest from pitfall traps, in grass and leaf litter in alder swamp, margin of beaver pond in leaf litter, small sedge marsh in moist grass litter, red oak forest from Lindgren funnel trap, and sifted from decaying mushrooms (Klimaszewski et al. 2005a, 2006, 2018). Material. USA, New Hampshire, Carroll Co.: Sandwich Notch, 15.VIII.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift leaf litter, 1 female. Coos Co.: Second College Grant, nr. Alder Brook Rd., 44.891242, -71.126214, 31.VII.2021, C. Ziadeh, pitfall trap S.2.89, 1 male. Merrimack Co, Concord Airport, 1 mi E Concord, DZ.4, pine-oak barrens, 4.V.2006, D.S. Chandler, sift grass & leaf litter by pond, 1 male. Strafford Co.: 1 mi SW Durham, 21.IV.1982, sift litter by marsh, D.S. Chandler, 1 female. 1 mi NW Durham, 287’, 2.X.2003, G.D. Whitmore, ZOOL 745, sift forest leaf litter, 1 male; 16.V.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift litter along swamp margin, 2 females; 21.IV.1982, D.S. Chandler, sift litter by marsh, 1 female. College Woods, Durham, 4.X.2007, B.W. Sanford, berlese meadow sod, 1 male. Thompson Farm, 3.5 km SW Durham, N43.11260°, W70.94755°, 17m, 8.IX.2005, berlese sod, S.J. Watkins, 1 female; N43.11223°, W70.94203°, 14m, 29.IX–13.X.2005, FITrap, beaver pond area, 1 female.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207