MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911314784 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10561761

Tachydromia maculipennis Walker 1849

2024· article· en· W6911314784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeBayType (biology)FloodplainInsectTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tachydromia maculipennis Walker (Fig. 10) Tachydromia maculipennis Walker, 1849: 507. Type locality: Canada, St. Martin’s Falls, Albany River, Hudson’s Bay (after Smith 1971: 367). Tachypeza pusilla Loew, 1864b: 87 [Cent. 5, no. 74]. Type locality: USA, Illinois. Tachydromia pusilla (Loew): Melander, 1910: 52 (synonymy). Phoneutisca bimaculata Loew: Melander, 1902: 204. Misidentification. Type material examined. Smith (1971: 367) provided data about the holotype of this species, which is represented only by two legs. Data on the syntype of Tachypeza pusilla Loew (including photos of labels and habitus) are available from the database of insect primary types in the collection of MCZ (https://mczbase.mcz.harvard.edu/ guid/ MCZ:Ent:1168). Additional material examined. CANADA. Manitoba: Aweme, 14.vi.1924, R.D. Bird (2 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); 2 mi. W Stockton, 26.v.1958, C.D.F. Miller (1 ♂, CNC); 5 mi. SW Chilo, ex choke-cherry, floodplain community nr. Tamarack Bog, 5.vi.1958, J.F. McAlpine (1 ♂, 7 ♀, CNC); 2 mi. W Stockton, ex flowers Erysimum aspersum, 26.v.1958, J.F. McAlpine (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Ninette, ex. Amelanchier blossoms, 16.v.1958, J.F. McAlpine (1 ♀, CNC). Ontario: Hog’s Back, 9.vi.1923, R. Ozborn (1 ♀, CNC); Chatham, 18333.D, 28.v.1928, A.B. Baired (1 ♀, CNC); same locality, 18333.D, 1.vi.1928, A.B. Baired (1 ♂, CNC); Simcoe, 29.v.1939, G.E. Shewell (1 ♂, 6 ♀, CNC); same locality, 2.vi.1939, G.E. Shewell (1 ♀, CNC); same locality, 3.vi.1939, G.E. Shewell (2 ♂, 4 ♀, CNC); same locality, 5.vi.1939, G.E. Shewell (2 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); same locality, 9.vi.1939, G.E. Shewell (1 ♀, CNC); same locality, host Spiraea, 18.vi.1939, G.E. Shewell (3 ♀, CNC); Ottawa, 1.vi.1939, O. Peck (1 ♀, CNC); Manotick, taken from Malaise trap, 27.v.1952 (3 ♂, 9 ♀, CNC); Marmora, Hawthorn, 29.v.1952, G.E. Shewell (1 ♂, CNC); Manotick, Malaise trap, vi.1952, J.F. McAlpine (2 ♂, CNC); Maynooth, host Spiraea, 18.vi.1953, J.F. McAlpine (9 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC); Ottawa, 31.v.1954, J. R. Vockeroth (1 ♂, CNC); Midland, 20.5.1959, J.G. Chillcott (1 ♀, CNC); Petawawa, 28.v.1959, J. R. Vockeroth (1 ♂, CNC); Ottawa, 8.vi.1959, hand-written name unclear (1 ♂, CNC); Osgoode, 22.v.1964, J. R. Vockeroth (1 ♀, CNC). Quebec: Lanoraie, 21.vi.1915, G. Beaulieu (1 ♀, CNC); Aylmer, 28.v.1923, C.H. Curran (1 ♂, CNC); Aylmer, 28.v.1923, C.H. Curran (1 ♂, CNC); Hull, 27.v.1923, C.H. Curran (4 ♂, 14 ♀, CNC); Hull, 4.vi.1923, C.H. Curran (1 ♂, CNC); Hemmingford, 13.vi.1930, J.B. Maltais, Tachydromia maculipennis Walk. (bimaculata Lw.) (1 ♀, CNC); Abbotsford, 22.v.1936, G. Shewell (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Abbotsford, 4.vi.1936, G. Shewell (2 ♂, 3 ♀, CNC); Abbotsford, 1.vi.1937, G. Shewell (1 ♀, CNC); Abbotsford, 1.vi.1937, G. Shewell (1 ♂, CNC); Old Chelsea, on flowers of Prunus pensylvanica, 16.v.1958, J. R. Vockeroth (2 ♀, CNC); Kingsmere, 16.v.1959, J.G. Chillcott (1 ♂, CNC); Breckenridge, 31.v.1959, C.H. Mann (1 ♂, CNC); Old Chelsea, Summit King Mt., 1150’, 22.vi.1961, J. R. Vockeroth (1 ♀, CNC); Mt. Orford, 1200’, 5.vi.1963 [no collector name] (1 ♀, CNC). Saskatchewan: Beat, ex. Euphorbia esula; Jamson, 30.v.1977, G. Thomas // Tachydromia maculipennis Walk., det. H.J. Teskey, 1978 (1 ♀, CNC). USA. Alaska: Circle, 25.vi.1948, S. Lienk, AlaskaIns Project (1 ♂, USNM). Colorado: Builder, Flagstaff Canyon, 5800’, on side of stream, 10.vi.1961, C.H. Mann (2 ♂, CNC). Connecticut: Redding, 14.v.1938, A.L. Melander (17 ♂, 10 ♀, USNM). Illinois: Macoupin Co., Carlinville, 4.6.1888, C.A. Robertson // Charles Robertson Collection, 7699 (1 ♀, INHS); Champaign Co., Urbana, 19.v.1892, J. Marten (1 ♂, INHS); Algonquin, 2.vi.1894 (1 ♀, INHS); same locality, 23.v.1895 (2 ♀, INHS); same locality, 22.v.1895 (1 ♀, INHS); same locality, 3.v.1896 (1 ♀, INHS); same locality, 8.v.1896 (6 ♀, INHS); same locality, 10.v.1896 (1 ♀, INHS); Macoupin Co., Carlinville, 18.v.1898, C.A. Robertson // Charles Robertson Collection, 20921 (1 ♀, INHS); Algonquin, 24.v.1908, Mason [1 ♀ with label Tachydromia pusilla Loew, Coquillett] (6 ♂, 11 ♀, INHS); same locality, 6.vi.1908, Mason (1 ♀, INHS); Havana, Gleason’s sand dune, 30.iv.1914 (1 ♂, INHS); St. Joseph, Salt Fork, 3.v.1914 (3 ♂, 1 ♀, INHS); same locality, 10.v.1914 (1 ♂, 2 ♀, INHS); same locality, 17.v.1914 (1 ♂, 3 ♀, INHS); Urbana, on flowers of Spiraea, 14.v.1914 (3 ♂, 7 ♀, INHS); Urbana, Fair Grounds, 20.v.1914 (1 ♀, INHS); Planeview, 3.v.1915 (1 ♀, INHS); Urbana, on flowers of dogwood, 23.v.1916 (2 ♀, INHS); Savanna, 14.vi.1917 (1 ♀, INHS); Meredosia, 28.v.1917 (2 ♀, INHS); same locality, 30.v.1917 (1 ♀, INHS); Dubois, 22.v.1917 (1 ♀, INHS); Alto Pass, 7.v.1917 (1 ♀, INHS); Muncie, Stony Cr., 10.v.1924 (1 ♀, INHS); Shawneetown, 28–29.iv.1926, coll. Auden & Frison (1 ♀, INHS); Antioch, on Prunus virginiana, 3.vi.1943, Ross & Sanderson (1 ♀, INHS); Baker, Indian Ck., 4.vi.1943, H.H. Ross & M.W. Sanderson (1 ♀, INHS); Elburn, Ill., on Prunus, 19.v.1944, Ross & Sanderson (3 ♂, 4 ♀, INHS); Halfday, 19.v.1944, Ross & Sanderson (1 ♂, INHS); Champaign Co., Ent. Class, 9.v.1965 (9 ♂, 13 ♀, INHS). Kansas: Pottawatomie, Co., 29.iv.1929, R.H. Painter (1 ♂, 1 ♀, USNM); Nat. Hist. Res. Lawrence, 26–28.v.1956, J.G. Chillcott (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC). Maryland: Beltsville, 13.v.1917, W.L. McAtee (1 ♀, USNM). Michigan: E. Lansing, 19.v.1936, C. Sabrosky // Tachydromia maculipennis Walk. (1 ♂, USNM); Lapeer Co, 30–31.v.1937, C. Sabrosky (4 ♀, USNM); E. Lansing, 3.vi.1937, C. Sabrosky (1 ♀, USNM); Lake Co., 20.v.1939, R. R. Dreisbach (2 ♀, CNC); Midland Co., 1.vi.1939, R. R. Dreisbach (1 ♀, CNC); same locality, 31.v.1944, R. R. Dreisbach (1 ♀, CNC); same locality, 21.v.1944, R. R. Dreisbach (1 ♀, CNC); same locality, 27.v.1951, R. R. Dreisbach (1 ♂, CNC); Saginaw Co., 20.v.1953, R. R. Dreisbach (1 ♀, CNC). New York: Ithaca, 5.v.1913 (1 ♂, USNM); same locality, 7.v.1913 (1 ♂, USNM). North Dakota: Burleugh Co., Long Lake, 4.vi.1969, W.W. Wirth (1 ♂, USNM). Ohio: Four-Mile Cr., nr. Oxford, 26.v.1979, B.A, Steinly (1 ♀, USNM). Pennsylvania: Rauchtown, Clinton Co., on blossoms of Fragaria sp., 15.v.1964, J.G. Chillcott (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC). Recognition. A small, robust species distinguished by the following combination of characters: proepisternum shiny; fore femur broadly brown ringed, yellow at apex and near base; wings mostly faintly infuscate, darker in cells r 1 and r 2+3, halter with dark knob. Redescription. Male (Fig. 10A). Length: body 1.6–1.8 mm, wing 1.5–1.7 mm. Head black. Occiput almost entirely shiny, only with patch of fine pruinosity above neck; 2 long, black vertical setae; some black setae around neck, with finer pale setae near mouth-opening; row of pale minute postoculars. Ocellar triangle shiny; ocellars short, lateroclinate. Frons shiny, slightly broadened towards ocellar tubercle, above antennae nearly 3.0 times as broad as anterior ocellus. Antenna brown. Postpedicel subglobular; stylus subapical, short, nearly 1.5 times as long as pedicel and postpedicel combined. Proboscis brown. Palpus unmodified, elongate oval, short (shorter than proboscis), brownish; clothed in scattered yellowish and brownish setulae, with 1 short (somewhat shorter than palpus) black subapical seta. Thorax black,largely shiny; prosternum,lower margin of notopleural depression,scutellum,meron(except middle part) and postnotum light grey tomentose. Postpronotal lobe large, slightly elongate oval, lacking conspicuous setae, with scattered minute setulae. Mesonotum with 1 black, long (posteriorly) and 1 short notopleurals, 1 moderately long postalar and 4–6 scutellars (cruciate apicals nearly as long as posterior notopleural seta, laterals shorter); some minute setulae present behind postpronotal lobe and on notopleural depression anteriorly; acrostichals lacking; dorsocentrals uniserial, scattered, mostly minute, 1 prescutellar pair somewhat longer (considerably shorter than postalar seta). Leg colour: coxae and trochanters entirely yellow; fore femur yellow apically and broader near base (broadly dark brown ringed), mid and hind femora yellow on extreme base; fore tibia yellowish closer to base; fore and mid tarsomeres 1–3 yellowish (more distinctly on fore tarsus), hind basitarsus mostly yellowish; otherwise legs dark brown. Coxae clothed in numerous pale to yellowish setae; fore coxa subshiny anteriorly. Fore femur strongly thickened, pubescent ventrally, with short, pale anteroventral and posteroventral setulae becoming longer closer to base. Fore tibiae spindle-shaped, with unmodified setation. Mid femur only slightly narrower than fore femur; shallow ventral excavation on basal half, bearing rows of short, black anteroventral and posteroventral spinule-like setae (latter somewhat stronger). Mid tibia with very small apical projection, bearing weakly prominent ventral spinule-like setulae. Hind femur nearly as broad as mid femur, unmodified, lacking prominent setae. Hind tibia and tarsus unmodified. Wing normally developed, rounded at apex, with unmodified venation; large faintly brownish infuscate, slightly paler closer to base but decidedly darker on cells r 1 and r 2+3. One very short, basal costal seta. Vein R 2+3 straight. Veins R 4+5 and M 1 parallel throughout. Vein M 4 distinct throughout. Crossveins r-m and bm-m broadly separated. Cell r 1 nearly as broad as cells r 2+3 and r 4+5. Calypter brownish, with scattered fringe. Halter with yellow stem and dark knob. Abdomen brownish; tergites faintly pruinose anteriorly and shiny posteriorly; sternites entirely shiny, mostly with scattered dark setulae; sternite 8 with long posteromarginal setae. Hypopygium (Fig. 10B–D) brown, large, rather subglobular. Right epandrial lamella (Fig. 10C) rather subglobular viewed laterally, bearing numerous long setae; without ventral projection. Right surstylus not separated from epandrial lamella, short, elongate oval (lateral view); bearing short setae. Left epandrial lamella (Fig. 10D) small, with some short setae apically. Left surstylus barely separated from epandrial lobe; rather large, elongate oval, wit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207