Scipopus (Phaeopterina) brevifurca Enderlein 1922
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scipopus (Phaeopterina) brevifurca Enderlein, 1922 Fig. 48 Scipopus brevifurca Enderlein, 1922: 210. Scipopus brevifurca – Czerny 1932: 274 (listed). — Hennig 1934: 322 (key), 325 (diagnosis); 1937: 48 (listed). — Steyskal 1968: 48.15 (catalog). — Schumann 1988: 88 (catalog). Differential diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) brevifurca resembles S. (Ph.) rufilabris, S. (Ph.) gorgonae, and S. (Ph.) uniformis sp. nov. in having uniformly dark brown wings and hind legs, but differs from consubgeners by the dark brown or black epicephalon. Type material examined Holotype (photographed in Berlin, 2002) ECUADOR • 1 ♂; Santa Inéz. Distr.; R. Haensch leg.; MNBG. Description HEAD. Palpus and clypeus orange. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose. Epicephalon shiny, dark brown, wide (width ⅔ or more of upper frontal vitta width at inner verticals), clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. All head chaetotaxy well-developed. THORAX. Scutum dark brown or black with silvery-blue sheen. Female cervical sclerite not observed. Postpronotal lobe and notopleuron dark brown.Thorax dark brown or black, entirely silvery microtrichose. Legs dark brown, paler brown basally; first fore tarsomere dark brown with ventral golden fringe, first hind tarsomere white. Wing uniformly brown infuscate. FEMALE ABDOMEN. Not observed. MALE ABDOMEN. Trichosity and ratios of tergites not observed. Genital fork with arms converging, inner basal process very short, barely distinguishable from arm. Epandrium elongate (length 2.0× height). Basiphallus not observed. Basal distiphallus long (≈ in length to epandrium). Phallic bulb, distal distiphallus, phallapodeme and hypandrium not observed. Distribution Ecuador. Hennig (1937) listed “Brazi, Pebas” as a locality, which more likely refers to Pebas, Peru.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".