MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911326619 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10534256

Tyrannosaurus Osborn 1905

2024· article· en· W6911326619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaurasiaCenomanianTaxonCretaceousApex predatorMesozoicAssemblage (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3.1. Diversity Patterns of Tyrannosaurs and Apex Predators The first argument for recognizing Nanotyrannus as a distinct taxon is that tyrannosaurids achieved high diversity in the latest Cretaceous (Table 3) and that well-sampled dinosaurian assemblages typically had several large predator species. This point is far from conclusive, but it is an important starting point in considering the evidence. All else being equal, we should expect multiple tyrannosaurs to exist in the latest Maastrichtian of North America, and arguments for the existence of a distinct taxon should, therefore, be considered carefully. Tyrannosaurs were diverse in the Late Cretaceous of Laurasia [4, 39, 52, 56 – 62]. Small tyrannosaurs of the Cenomanian [63] and Turonian [64, 65] were replaced by large-bodied tyrannosaurs by the Campanian [52, 57]. Multiple lineages evolved, including the gracile Albertosaurinae [66] and robust Tyrannosaurinae [56]. Tyrannosaurs also show endemicity; distinct taxa occur up and down the Western Interior from Mexico [62] and the American Southwest [52, 56, 58, 59] north into the Northern Great Plains [61, 67] and the High Arctic [68], implying high speciation rates. Strikingly, several well-sampled assemblages supported two distinct tyrannosaurid taxa. The Dinosaur Park Formation assemblage of southern Canada included at least two species, the gracile Gorgosaurus libratus [66] and the larger and more robust Daspletosaurus [67]; similarly, Gorgosaurus and Daspletosaurus coexist in the Judith River Formation [69]. The Nemegt Formation of Mongolia was home to the small and gracile Alioramus [70] and the larger, more robust Tarbosaurus [53]. Although many formations contain just one species, these formations are generally poorly sampled, producing either a handful of diagnostic remains, or often, a single diagnostic specimen, so their low diversity may be due to sampling. The Horseshoe Canyon Formation is perhaps the only well-sampled formation in western North America to have a single tyrannosaur [71]. While our sample of faunas is limited and imperfect, it appears that, as often as not, multiple tyrannosaurs coexisted. Other theropods show similar patterns. Multiple abelisaurids coexisted in the late Maastrichtian of Morocco [72], the Campanian-Maastrichtian La Colonia Formation of Argentina [73], and the Maastrichtian Lameta Formation of India [74 – 77]. Several large carnivores coexisted in the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds of Morocco [78, 79] and the Cenomanian Candeleros Formation of Argentina [80, 81]. The Late Jurassic of North America had four medium to giant carnivores— Marshosaurus, Torvosaurus, Allosaurus, and Ceratosaurus. Torvosaurus, Allosaurus, and Ceratosaurus co-occur in the Late Jurassic of Europe, and high diversity is also seen in the Late Jurassic of East Africa [82]. Similar patterns occur in mammals and marine vertebrates. Mammalian apex predators are small relative to dinosaurs, but in North America, saber-toothed Smilodon coexisted with American lions, dire wolves [83], and the cheetah-like Miracinonyx [84], and these would have been joined by puma and jaguars [85]. In Europe, saber-toothed cats coexisted with cave lions and hyenas [83]. In Africa, as recently as 1.5 Ma, the saber-toothed cats Dinofelis and Homotherium, lions, leopards, cheetahs, and hyenas coexisted [86]. The more depauperate predator communities of modern ecosystems are likely due to human-induced [87] megafaunal extinctions and give a biased picture of terrestrial predator diversity. Similarly, marine ecosystems typically have multiple species of apex predators. Several species of large, predatory mosasaurs coexisted in the Maastrichtian [88, 89], and the giant shark Otodus megalodon coexisted with the predatory whale Livyatan [90]. Modern marine ecosystems, meanwhile, have two different large apex predators, great whites [91] and orcas [85], as well as smaller apex predators, such as false killer whales and leopard seals [85]. It is also common for clades of predators to show size disparity. Felids range from 1.1–1.6 kg (Prionaillurus rubiginosus) to over 300 kg (Panthera tigris) [85], and canids range from 1.0– 1.5 kg (Vulpes zerda) to 80 kg (Canis lupus); mustelids range from 25–250 g (least weasel, Mustela nivelis) to a maximum of 32 kg (wolverine, Gulo gulo) [85]. Among varanids, masses range from 16.3 g (Dampier Peninsula monitor, Varanus sparnus) to 80 kg (Komodo dragon, Varanus komodoensis) [92]. Among birds [93], falcons range from 43 g (black-thighed falconet, Microhierax fringillarius) to 1.75 kg (Gyrfalcon, Falco rusticolus); hawks range from 93 g (Pearl Kite, Gampsonyx swainsonii) to 8.2 kg (Cape Griffon, Gyps coprotheres). Many of these size ranges were still larger in the Pleistocene prior to the elimination of larger members of these clades by humans. Within predator clades, diversity tends to be higher towards the lower end of the mass range; that is, there are fewer species of big cats than small cats, fewer wolves than foxes, many small weasels and ferrets, and just one wolverine [85]. The reasons for these patterns are unknown, but they imply higher speciation rates at low mass, higher extinction at large size, or both. In light of this, one would expect the diversity of small tyrannosaurs to be higher than for large tyrannosaurs. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, but the existence of multiple large predators in the late Maastrichtian of North America would be ordinary. It would be extraordinary to find a single, giant predator and no smaller species. In light of other dinosaur faunas, modern mammal communities, and marine faunas, niche partitioning between large predators is the rule. In no known ecosystem—dinosaurian, mammalian, terrestrial, or marine—did a single, giant species of predator dominate. If T. rex was the only tyrannosaurid in the ecosystem, then this leaves a remarkable gap in size between T. rex, approaching [103] or exceeding [104] 8000–9000 kg in mass, and the dromaeosaurs Dakotaraptor steini [105] and Acheroraptor temertyorum [106], which were more than an order of magnitude smaller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→