The Rise of the Ideal Urban City Model: Amsterdam, Netherlands and the Evolution of Sephardic Jewish Urban Design in the Golden Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This project examines the Portuguese Synagogue in Amsterdam, Netherlands as a case study for the impact and development of successful urban planning, and how certain cultural minorities such as Sephardic Jews within the Iberian Peninsula and Latin America shaped the city’s geography over time. This research project argues that the exchange between the architecture and materials in the colonies, as well as the Dutch Baroque style that will ultimately shape the Sephardic Jewish community’s central synagogue and Jewish Quarter into the ideal urban city model, ushered the Netherlands into a Golden Age. This research project is predominantly focused on social and architectural history, specifically within marginalized groups that are often brushed to the outskirts of historical records. The scope of this project falls between the Dutch Golden Age and the Colonial Period. This project uses historiography, geographical and architectural analysis, and a critique of urban development. This project intends to analyze urban planning and how design influences a city’s overall economic and social success on a transatlantic world stage, as well as to critique and decolonize former colonial spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".