Chromosome-level genome assembly of Triticum turgidum var 'Kronos'
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This data is made available under the Toronto Agreement. All of the data listed here is available under the prepublication data sharing principle of the Toronto agreement (1). By using this data, you agree to: respect the rights of the data producers and contributors to analyze and publish the first global analyses and certain other reserved analyses of this data set in a peer-reviewed publication. not redistribute, release, or otherwise provide access to the data to anyone outside of the group, until the data has been published & submitted to the public data repositories. contact the authors to discuss any plans to publish data or analyses that utilize this data to avoid the overlap of any planned analyses. fully cite the prepublication data along with any applicable versioning details. understand that this data as accessed is precompetitive and is not patentable in its present state. This agreement does not expire by time but only upon publication of the first global analysis by the data producers and contributors.(1) Toronto International Data Release Workshop Authors. Prepublication data sharing. Nature 461, 168–170 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/461168a If you have questions about the use of this dataset, please contact Ksenia Krasileva: kseniak [at] berkeley.edu Summary of the datasets We produced 526 Gbp of high-fidelity (HiFi) reads for Kronos. As Kronos typically self-pollinates in the field and its residual heterozygosity is low, these reads were assembled with hifiasm v0.19.5-r587 (-l0) to produce haplotype-collapsed assembly. Primary and associated contigs were concatenated into a single file. These contigs are in the files with the prefix 'Kronos.contigs'. The concatenated primary and associated contigs were further scaffolded with chromosome conformation capture sequencing (Hi-C) data. We used yahs v1.2a.2. The resulting 14 largest scaffolds were greater than 600 Mbp in size, representing 14 chromosomes (7 x AB). These scaffolds were renamed based on the similarity to the bread wheat reference genome from the IWGSC. After plasmid genomes were separated, the rest of the contigs or scaffolds, which were all smaller than 4 Mbp, were concatenated into a single sequenced named 'Un' (for unplaced). These sequences can be found in the files with the prefix 'Kronos.collapsed'. Updates in Zenodo v2 In the genome version 1.1, the following chromosomes are reversed and complemented: 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 5A, 6A and 6B. This adjustment was made to ensure the alignment (orientation) of the chromosome arms remains consistent with that of the bread wheat reference genome. The gene models were initially generated using BRAKER, GINGER, and Funannotate, all of which utilized protein evidence, transcript evidence generated from paired-end RNA-seq data, and independently trained ab initio predictors. Consensus annotations were derived using EvidenceModeler by merging the gene models from the three predictions, transcripts assembled with PASA, and protein sequences from closely related species aligned with miniprot. PASA was also employed to update alternative transcripts and untranslated regions. The high-confidence set (Kronos.v1.0.high) comprises 69,808 genes. These gene models have start and stop codons and have homologs in public databases with 97% or more bidirectional coverages. The low-confidence set (Kronos.v1.0.low) has 44,381 genes, including putative pseudogenes and gene fragments. Some of the genes are partially annotated, and we are in process of improving the annotations. Please use the genome version v1.1 for this annotation set. Acknowledgement This work has been funded by the United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute for Food and Agriculture Award (2021-67013-35726).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".