MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911559864 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13243159

Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis

2024· article· en· W6911559864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfusionCorrect nameApex (geometry)HolotypeContrast (vision)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché) (Figs 47–92) Six names are currently listed in synonymy with H. haemorrhoidalis (ThripsWiki 2023), and in view of the confusion with H. angustior we re-examined the types of four of these. The depositary of the original specimens of adonidum and ceylonicus remains unknown, and their current synonymic status are therefore accepted. However, the type specimens of H. abdominalis Reuter, H. semiaureus Girault and Dinurothrips rufiventris Girault all match the current definition of H. haemorrhoidalis. Wilson (1975) decided to treat H. ceylonicus as a valid species, but slides identified by him with this name comprise specimens that would fit in both H. haemorrhoidalis and H. angustior currently. As in H. angustior, specimens of H. haemorrhoidalis exhibit variations on antennal segment VI, mesonotum and metascutum, that are here interpreted as intraspecific. The antennal segment II varies in color from brown to pale, a characteristic shared among individuals from Brazil (Figs 66, 70, 74). The dark brown coloration of antennal segment VI is variable and can fill almost the entire segment or only the apical third of the segment. The mesonotum usually has equiangular reticles, but they can be either more circular or more rectangular, never linear. The metascutal triangle flange can extend more or less over the metascutellum, and the shape and number of reticles that form the metascutal triangle can be either round or elongated, with the triangle margins straight or convex. Abdominal segments VII–X vary from brown to golden yellow with the apex of X brown. Our observations suggest that variations occur both within and between populations of H. haemorrhoidalis, therefore this name is used for all specimens with the character states given in the key. As a result, the presence of H. haemorrhoidalis is here confirmed in 18 American countries: Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Jamaica, Mexico, Peru, Puerto Rico, Saint Lucia, Trinidad and Tobago, USA and Venezuela. Wilson (1975) also recognized several types of pore plates on males of Heliothrips that he suggested might represent different species. The form with dark abdomen and transverse pore plates represents H. angustior as defined here. However, further examination of males with golden yellow abdomen and either circular or oval pore plates did not reveal any further major differences between them. Mound (1976) suggested that male characters of H. haemorrhoidalis would not be subject to selection due to their rarity, and that variations in these males were not of taxonomic significance. Material Studied. Deposited at NHM: Bahamas. Nassau, 1.vii.1980, 5 females (F.D.Bennelt). Barbados. 10.vi.1986, on Acalypha, 1 female (F.D.Bennelt); St. Michael, on Citrus sinensis, Min. Of Agne 6., 1 female, 14.iii.1968; iii.1971, on citrus, 1 female (F.D. Bennelt). Bermuda. Bermuda Agr. Station, Paget E. T-8, on Croton, 9-1-34, 3 females (T.A.Russel). Colombia. 20 Km South of Cali, Dahlia apical leaves, 2 females, 14.vii.1983 (L.A.Mound). Costa Rica. Poas Volcano, grass by road, 1 female, 30.vi.1983; UCR San Pedro, avocado leaves, 3 females, 20.iv.1992; La Selva, Pentaclethra canopy fogging, 1 female, 5.x.1992; San Ramon des Tres Rios, flowers of shrub, 1 female, 15.ix.1991; San Vito, Wilson Bot. Garden, flowers, 1 female, 17.ix.1991 (L.A.Mound). Jamaica. Cinchora, on Sudan grass flowers, 10.ix.1972, 1 female (J. Metcalfe). Puerto Rico. Villalba, Doña Juana Forest, on Acalypha wilkesiana var. marginata, 18.vi.1959, 2 females (S. Medina). Tobago. 8.ix.1936, 1 female; 3.ix.1936, 1 female (A.M.A. Adamson). Trinidad. Toco, 3.ii.1936, 1 female; St. Augustine, 2.x.1936, 1 female (A.M.A. Adamson). Deposited at USNM: Argentina. Córdoba, on Acalypha sp. and hot house plants, no date, 1 female (O.C.Molinari). Bermuda. Intercepter at NY, on Bryophyllum, 4.iii.1913, 1 female (Post). Canada. Interception at Seattle, on Rhododendrons, 21.x.1939, 1 female (Scott); same host ans place, 22.x.1941, 1 female (no collector data). Colombia. Santa Marta, at NY In calyx em of fruit of Eugenia plummer, 5.iv.1939, 1 female and 1 male. Cuba. Santiago de las Vegas, on Persea gratissima, 7.ii.1912, 1 female (P.Cardin). Ecuador. Guayaquil, on olive tree, vii-ix.1933, 2 females (T.H.Johsnon); Pichilingue, on cacao leaves, 16.x.1944, 8 females (J.E.Hambleton). Ecuador. Machala, on conocut fruits, 27.ix.1944, 4 females (E.J.Hambleton); Galapagos Islands, Santa Cruz, Los Gemelos, Scalesia Forest, 6110m, 1–28.i.1989, 16 females (Peck and Sinclair col.). Guatemala. Puerto Barrias, on Acalypha, 9.v.1945, 1 female (E.J.Hambleton). Mexico. San Jose del Cabo, distrito Sur, Baja Cas, on mango, vii. 1919, 7 females and 1 male (Q.Ferris); Mor. Cuernavaca, on leaves of Codiaeum veriegatum, 28.viii.1944, 7 females (N.L.H.Krauss). Peru. Bay leaf interception in Miami, 31.i.1966, 3 females (E.B.Lee); intercepted on Gardenia sp. flower in Miami, 1.xi.1992, 1 female (J. Simmons); intercepted at Washington DC On Cypripedium clinkaberianum, 20.xi.1935, 1 female. Puerto Rico. Rio Piedras, 14.xi.1919, 1 female (E.G.); Lares, on wild cotton, 1.iv.1936, 1 female (L.C. Fife). Saint Lucia. on Croton leaf., 14.i.1939, 1 female (Ehinger). Trinidad. Princes Town, on Jatropha gossipiifolia. Ii.1999, 7 females (T.A. Heard & V. Lopez). USA. Alabama, Spring Hill, on Viburnum macrophyllus, 15.vii.1937, 3 females; same place, on Azalea, 11.v.1938, 8 females (L.L. English). California, Pasadena, outdoors on leaves of Laurestina, 5.xi.1915, 3 females (A.G.Smith); Tomales Bay State Park, 15.vii.1961, 1 female (T. Kono); San Francisco Golden Gate Park, on Myrtaceae flowers, 11.vii.1992 (S.Nakahara). Connecticut, New Haven, on grape ivy in house, 5.iv.1948, 3 females (C. Parsans); same place, in Gardenia, 3.iv.1948, 3 females (Fitch). Florida, Clearwater, on dead branches, 23.xii.1937, 3 females (J.D.Hood); Orlando, on branches, leaves and trunk of live oak covered with Spanish moss, 6.xi.1914, 1 female (C.B.Williams); Emeralda, on shumae leaves, 17.xi.1914, 1 female (C.B.Williams); Welaka, Welaka Conservation Reserve, University of Florida, on Persea borbonia, 29.vi.1954, 4 females (J.D.Hood). Louisiana, New Orleans, on Croton sp., 14.v.1924, 4 females (H.K.Plank); same place, on live oak covered with Spanish moss, 2.xii.1914, 1 female (C.B.Williams). Maryland, Bethesda, on arborvita, 24.viii.1941, 3 females, 30.vi.1943, 2 females (J.C.Crawford); College Park, on peach in greenhouse, 10.xii.1913, 2 females in one slide (W.H.White); Glenn Dale, on Rhododendron pentaphyllum, 2.xi.1938, 2 females (Wood). New Hampshire, Hanover, on leaves of Berberis potanini from Chico, Cal., 19.xii.1917 (J.H.Gerould). Venezuela. Monte Oscuro, Coloni Tovas, Persea americana, 21.iii.1991, 1 female (E.Doreste). Deposited at CHNUFPI: Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: Petrópolis, on Solanaceae, 19.xii.2019, 1 female; São Paulo: Santo Antonio do Pinhal, on samambaia, (no date), 1 female; Santa Catarina: Descanso, on Prunus sp., 18.vii.2019, 3 females; Ceará: Pacoti, on Codiacum, 29.i.2022, 2 females; Paraíba: Areia, on Psidium guajava, 2.xi.2019, 1 female; Minas Gerais: Tiradentes, on Polypodium persicifolium, 17.xii.2019, 1 female; Sergipe: São Cristóvão, on Flamboyant, 6.xi.2019, 1 female (E.F. B.Lima). Deposited at UFRGS: Brazil. Rio Grande do Sul: Eldorado do Sul, 04.iii.2010, 1 female (L.Podgaiski), São Francisco de Paula, on Rudgea parquioides, 26.i.2013, 1 female, (A.Cavalleri), Porto Alegre, on Dodonaea viscosa, 08.iii.2011, 1 female (A.Cavalleri).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control→French-language works237,207→