MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911604123 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13287157

Scatophila hirtirostris Sturtevant and Wheeler

2024· article· en· W6911604123 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClawWingDorsumBasal (medicine)SetaTrunk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

12. Scatophila hirtirostris Sturtevant and Wheeler Figs. 91, 100–106, 129 Scatophila hirtirostris Sturtevant and Wheeler 1954: 194.— Wirth 1965: 758 [Nearctic catalog].— Zatwarnicki 1987: 293 [checklist].— Zatwarnicki and Mathis 1994: 364 [phylogeny, noctula group].— Mathis and Zatwarnicki 1995: 283 [world catalog]. Diagnosis.—This species is distinguished from congeners by the following combination of characters: Small to moderately small shore flies, body length 1.40–2.10 mm. Head (Figs. 100–103): Mesofrons and fronto-orbital plate blackish brown; parafrons charcoal black; face of ♂ with a stout medial conical tubercle nearly as large as basal flagellomere, tubercle with a ventromedial papilla-like structure. Gena moderately short, subequal to half height of basal flagellomere. Gena short, gena-to-eye ratio 0.17–0.19. Thorax (Figs. 91, 119): Mesonotum (Fig. 119) tannish brown with grayish vertical stripes; scutum mostly brown with faint to evident pattern of linear gray areas anterior, laterad of acrostichal tracks; sometimes with a thin, medial, gray stripe; presutural dorsocentral setae lacking. Wing (Fig. 91) variable, infuscate, pattern of white spots conspicuous; veins R 2+3 and R 4+5 sinuous; cell r 1 with a single, weak, basal white area, or wing very pale, not appearing spotted; costal vein ratio 0.24–0.27; M 1 vein ratio 0.59–0.62; knob of halter yellowish. Legs generally dark colored; femora and tibiae blackish brown with sparse microtomentum; tarsi black; male midfemur lacking row of spine-like setulae along posteroventral margin. Abdomen (Figs. 104–106): Generally black, subshiny to shiny, especially on apical tergites, basal tergites at most thinly microtomentose medially and lateroventrally. Male terminalia (Figs. 104–106): Epandrium in posterior view (Fig. 104) generally obovate except for broadly truncate ventral margin and shallowly and roundly angulate lateral margins, width at angulate midheight only slightly less than overall height, width of ventral margin slightly greater than height of cercal opening; dorsal margin of epandrium in posterior view (Fig. 104) somewhat broadly rounded from very shallowly curved dorsomedial section above cercal opening; epandrial setae about equal in length, sparser medially and laterally, more abundant along ventral margin; height of cercal opening about 0.40 epandrial height; cerci in posterior view (Fig. 104) semihemispherical; aedeagus in lateral view (Fig. 106) generally appearing as 2 boxes attached at their corners, base truncate, thereafter dorsally and ventrally flat, dorsal flattened margin part of deep excavation with a wide opening, posterior rectangular box with anterodorsal angle greatly produced, this extension roundly tapered along dorsal margin to a point, ventral margin of extension with basal short lobe and wide notch before pointed apex, in ventral view (Fig. 105) as a square basal position, thereafter narrowed, tapered to broadly rounded apex; ventral aedeagal process shallowly C-shaped; phallapodeme in lateral view (Fig. 106) elongate, narrow, shallowly curved, widest at midlength with slightly elevated keel, in ventral view (Fig. 105) T-shaped, basal crossbar about half length of medial process, crossbar shallowly sinuous along anterior margin; postgonite in lateral view (Fig. 106) generally V-shaped, vertex pointed, posterior arm wider, with thumb-like extension, bearing setulae along posterodorsal margin, dorsal arm narrowly rectangular, ventral arm of V longer and thinner than dorsal arm; neohypandrium in lateral view (Fig. 106) narrow, bowl shaped, narrow, strap-like. Type Material.— The holotype male of Scatophila hirtirostris Sturtevant and Wheeler is labeled “ SteeseHya [the Steese Highway runs northeast from Fairbanks, Alaska] Alak MP 37 [Mile Post 37, “37” handwritten] IX-3-48 [3 Sep 1948] GJefferson/ Alaskans Project [Alaska Insect Project]/ HOLOTYPE Scatophila hirtirostris Stvt & Whlr [red].” The holotype is glued to a paper triangle, is in good condition [right hind leg missing, tarsomeres of left leg missing], and is deposited in the USNM. Other Specimens Examined.— UNITED STATES. ALASKA. Fairbanks North Star: Chena Lake Recreation Area (64°47.6'N, 147°11.4'W), 10 Aug 2003, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♂, 5♀; USNM); Steese Highway (mile post 37) (65°10.6'N, 147°16.1'W), 3 Sep 1948, G. Jefferson (1♂; USNM). Juneau: Douglas Island, Fish Creek (58°19.8'N, 134°35.7'W), 20 Jul 2011, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♂; USNM). Kenai Peninsula: Homer (59°38.8'N, 151°31.5'W), 2 Aug 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (2♂; USNM); Seward (20 km N; 60°16.5'N, 149°20.7'W; Grayling Lake), 31 Jul 2002, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♂, 1♀; USNM). Matanuska-Susitna: Matanuska (61°32.5'N, 149°13.8'W; rotary trap), 31 May–6 Jun 1944, J. C. Chamberlin (1♂, 3♀; USNM); Willow Creek (61°46.1'N, 150°04.2'W; 50 m), 10 Jul 2006, D. and W. N. Mathis (3♀; USNM). Valdez-Cordova (Census Area): Gulkana River (19.3 km N Glennallen; 62°16.1'N, 145°23.1'W), 9 Jul 2006, D. and W. N. Mathis (1♀; USNM). Yukon-Koyukuk (Census Area): Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge (66°17.6'N, 152°54.5'W; sandy, rocky beach), 21 Jun 2003, H. Williams (1♂; UAF). Type Locality.— United States. Alaska. Fairbanks North Star: Steese Highway (mile post 37) (65°10.6'N, 147°16.1'W). Distribution (Fig. 129).— Nearctic: United States (Alaska). Remarks.—This species is placed in the noctula group. Thus far, this species is known only from Alaska, but it would be expected in the far eastern regions of Russia or in the Yukon and/or Northwest Territories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorFrench-language works237,207