Zopheromimus auriborussiensis Alekseev et Nabozhenko 2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zopheromimus auriborussiensis Alekseev et Nabozhenko, 2023 (Figs 42–44) Material examined. One specimen with collection number JDC-11965 [JDC], Baltic amber; adult, sex unknown. A complete beetle is included in a transparent, yellow amber piece with dimensions of 20× 17 mm and a maximum thickness of 5 mm, preserved without supplementary fixation. Syninclusions: absent. Note. Body length of beetle JDC-11965 (including visible part of head) 4.9 mm. This specimen has 5-5-4 tarsal formula, protruding hemispherical eyes, and 11-segmented antennae with weakly developed 2-segmented club. Specimen JDC-11965 shares with the holotype of Z. auriborussiensis other external characters and is considered conspecific. The smaller body size (4.9 mm in contrast to 5.3 mm in the holotype) is interpreted as intraspecific variability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".