MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911644937 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14286036

Perilampus pilosus Yoo & Darling 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6911644937 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeFrench hornPopulus euphraticaType (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perilampus pilosus Yoo & Darling sp. nov. Figs 14, 15 Type locality. USA, Texas, 3.5 mi SE La Sauceda. Type material. Holotype. “ USA, Texas, Presidio Co. Big Bend Ranch SNA McGuirks Tanks on desert willows 12. V. 1990, R Wharton ”. The holotype is point-mounted (Female ROME 182765, TAMU). BOLD: AEF 0151 / ITS 2. ROM Online Collection. Paratypes. USA: 3 females, 3 males. Arizona: 2 females. Graham Co., Pinaleno Mountains, Ash Creek near Cluff Ranch Wildlife Area, 14 km SW Pima, 32°47.69'N, 109°51.42'W: (1 female: ROME 152679 - CNC; ITS 2). Pinaleno Mountains, Gilespie Wash, 10 km W Jct. 191 on hwy 266, 32 ° 33 ' 91 " N, 109°45'59"W: (1 female: ROME 182819 - USNM; BOLD: AEF 0151). California: 1 female, 1 male. San Bernardino Co., Joshua Tree N. P., 29 Palms, JTNP, Oasis of Mara, 34°07'42"N, 116°02'19"W: (1 female: ROME 189067 - UCRC; COI; ITS 2. 1 male: ROME 189068 - UCRC; BOLD: AEF 0151; ITS 2). Texas: 2 males. Presidio Co., Big Bend Ranch SNA, McGuirks Tanks: (1 male: ROME 182761 - TAMU; BOLD: AEF 0151; ITS 2). Big Bend Ranch SNA, McGuirks Tanks, 29°28'34"N, 103°49'12"W: (1 male: ROME 182757 - TAMU; BOLD: AEF 0151; ITS 2). Material examined. Mexico: 5 females. USA: 19 females, 29 males. (Suppl. materials). Additional material examined. Mexico: 1 female. Sonora: 1 female. (1 female: ROME 189096 - UCDC). Etymology. The specific epithet is the Latin adjective pilosus (hairy), in reference to the densely setose face. Description. Female (Figs 14, 15 A). Length: 3.0– 4.4 mm. Color: head, mesosoma, and metasoma iridescent greenish blue or violet with or without weak cupreous mesonotum (Fig. 14 B), or iridescent green with strong cupreous mesonotum (Fig. 15 A); clypeus ventral margin black (Fig. 14 I); antenna with scape and pedicel weakly iridescent greenish blue or violet, flagellum brown or black, lighter ventrad and distad. Head (Fig. 14 G – J): in dorsal view transverse, width slightly greater than twice length, HW / HL 2.1–2.2. Frontal carina: in anterior view straight to weakly sinuate below midlevel of eye; in dorsal view gradually narrowed V shape around median ocellus, FC / MOD 1.5–1.9; distance from lateral ocellus short to long FCLO / LOD 0.6–1.0. Scrobal cavity (Fig. 14 H): in anterior view wide, SW / HW about 0.5. Ocelli (Fig. 14 G): a line between anterior margin of lateral ocelli nearly bisecting median ocellus or reaching posterior margin of median ocellus. POL / OOL 1.8–2.0. Ocellar ratios LOD: POL: OOL: LOL 1, 2.9–3.5, 1.6–1.8, 1.1–1.4. Vertex: with strong to weak transverse striations, without large piliferous punctures. Parascrobal area: in lateral view gradually narrowed towards lower eye margin; width narrow, PSW / EL 0.2–0.3; sculpture strongly to weakly striate, without large piliferous punctures. Gena (Fig. 14 J): entirely striate along outer eye margin, striate posterad. Malar space: MSL / EH about 0.2. Lower face (Fig. 14 H, I): with setae dense and widely distributed laterad torulus, and dense below. Clypeus (Fig. 14 I): CW / CH 1.4–1.5; ventral margin concave; setae evenly distributed, or with small bare area without setae medially. Mesosoma (Fig. 14 B – F, K, L): Lateral panel of pronotum: about as wide as prepectus, LPP / PPT 0.8–0.9; without flange below level of mesothoracic spiracle in posterior oblique view (Fig. 14 D). Mesofemoral depression: smooth or weakly imbricate (Fig. 14 L). Mesoscutum: punctures angulate, with narrow or slightly wide and weakly coriarious interspaces (Fig. 14 B); lateral lobe smooth or weakly coriarious along notaulus (Fig. 14 C); parascutal carina broadly curved, acuminate (Fig. 14 E). Mesoscutellum: apex with inner margins gradually diverging (Fig. 14 K); punctures angulate, with narrow or slightly wide and weakly coriarious interspaces. Axilla (Fig. 14 F): in lateral view imbricate dorsad and rugose-areolate or carinate ventrad. Axillula: smooth dorsad. Fore wing: stigma small, 2.0–2.5 × as wide as postmarginal vein. Male (Fig. 15 B – G). Length: usually smaller, 2.3–3.1 mm. As in female, except: Color: mesonotum with strong or weak cupreous iridescence. Frontal carina: distance from lateral ocellus as wide or shorter, FCLO / LOD 0.5–0.6. Scape: pits sparse, covering 0.3–0.4 × scape length. Diagnosis. Perilampus pilosus can be distinguished by the combination of an advanced median ocellus (Figs 14 G, 15 D cf. Figs 8 G, 9 D), dense and widely distributed setae on the face (Figs 14 H, 15 C cf. Figs 8 H, 9 C), lateral panel of the pronotum without a flange (Fig. 14 D cf. Fig. 16 D), and the sparsely pitted male scape (Fig. 15 F, G cf. Fig. 17 G, H). Perilampus pilosus specimens with cupreous mesonota are superficially similar to P. sonora (Fig. 15 A cf. Fig. 22 B) but differ in having dense setae laterad of the torulus (Figs 14 I, 15 E cf. Figs 22 I, 23 E). Distribution (Fig. 25 F). Southwestern and central USA, and western and southern Mexico: USA (California, New Mexico, Texas), Mexico (Baja California Sur, Morelos, Sonora). Host association. Perilampus pilosus is a hyperparasitoid, parasitizing dipteran parasitoids of Lepidoptera. Hosts: Tachinidae (Diptera). Chaetogena sp. from Hemileuca juno Packard (Saturniidae). Variation. A female from Sonora, Mexico (ROME 189096) has the frontal carina close to the lateral ocellus (FCLO / OD about 0.5) and iridescent olivaceous head. Remarks. This species is supported by both genes (Fig. 1, Suppl. material 5), and there are five BINed specimens on BOLD (AEF 0151) from the western and central USA. All specimens except (ROME 189067) are grouped as a monophyletic clade in COI (Suppl. material 2). The low COI sequence quality in ROME 189067 likely caused its exclusion from the monophyletic clade as evidenced by poor peak shapes in a chromatogram. All specimens including ROME 189067 are grouped as monophyletic with both ITS 2 and concatenated datasets (Fig. 1, Suppl. material 2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207