Bibliographic record
Abstract
GASTROGONATOCERUS Ogloblin, 1935 (Figs 141–146) Gastrogonatocerus Ogloblin, 1935c: 66 (as subgenus of Gonatocerus). Type species: Gastrogonatocerus membraciphagus Ogloblin, 1935, by original designation. Diagnosis. Back of head with transorbital sulcus complete, extending from ventral margin of each eye to dorsal margin of foramen, thus separating occiput from gena (Fig. 141b); dorsellum rhomboidal, with posterior margin evenly convex (Fig. 144); fore wing with microtrichia mostly absent posterior to and just distal to venation (Fig. 143), thereafter fairly uniformly but often sparsely distributed; propodeum medially and submedially with 2 or 3 fine and faint longitudinal carinae between submedian carinae (when present) and propodeal spiracle often huge (Fig. 144); ovipositor and sheaths almost always extending anteriorly in wide gastral sac ventral to mesosoma (Fig. 145), exceptionally not extending anterior to gaster (Fig. 146b). Remarks. Gastrogonatocerus belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera. Gastrogonatocerus is most similar to Gahanopsis. Both have a complete transoccipital sulcus, and an anteriorly projecting gastral sac. The gastral sac is much narrower and usually projects farther anteriorly than in Gahanopsis, and the shape of the dorsellum and the propodeal carinae are different from Gastrogonatocerus. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera. Important reference s. Triapitsyn et al. (2010), Huber (2015a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".