MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911710079 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13773153

Paraxenopygus opacipennis Bernhauer. Scale 1927

2024· article· en· W6911710079 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocalityType localityAge structureAdult male

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paraxenopygus opacipennis Bernhauer, 1927 (Figures 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5M–O, 6) Paraxenopygus opacipennis Bernhauer, 1927, p. 166. Type material Holotype, female, with labels: ‘ Itatiaya, Est. do Rio [Brazil: Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia, −22.50°, −44.56°], 100 m, 17.vi.1925, J.F. Zikan [leg.]’/‘ Paraxenopygus opacipennis Brnh Typus unic’./‘ Chicago NHMus M. Bernhauer Collection’ /‘ Bernhauer Brazil Types Photographed E. Caron 2017’/‘FMNHINS3048929’. Bernhauer (1927) mentioned that he had only one specimen, therefore this is the holotype. In the collection of FMNH. Additional materials BRAZIL: Goiás: Jatai [−17.88°, −51.83°], Fauvel leg. (1 female RISNB); Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Universidade Federal de Viçosa [−20.76°, −42.87°], 21.vi.1999, F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello leg. (1 female CZUG); Paraná: Piraquara Mananciais da Sierra, −25.493°, −48.979°, 11.xi.2011, Acromyrmex refuse, M. Caterino and A. Tishechkin leg. (1 male, 1 female UFPR); Rio de Janeiro: Rio de Janeiro [−22.91°, −43.20°], Fry coll., Bernhauer coll. (1 female FMNH); Reprasa Guanabara [−22.951°, −43.211°], vi.1966, malaise, M. Alvarenga leg., Scheepeltz coll. (1 female NMW); Santa Catarina: Nova Teutônia [Seara] [−27.25°, −50.33°], xi.[19]72, with Acromyrmex, F. Plaumann leg., Newton coll. (1 male, 1 female FMNH); same locality and collector, ix.1966, (1 female MZSP); same locality and collector, 7.xii.1938, Bernhauer coll. (1 male FMNH); same locality and collector, 21.v.1941 (1 female CNC); same locality and collector, 21.vi.1941 (1 female CNC); same locality and collector, 300–500 m, x.1952 (1 female CNC); same locality and collector, x.1950 (1 male CNC); same locality and collector, xii.1942 (1 male CNC); unknown state: unknown locality, Brown coll., Sharp coll. (1 female NHMUK). Diagnosis Paraxenopygus opacipennis can be distinguished from all other species of Paraxenopygus by the metallic bronze colouration of the head and pronotum (Figure 2E), the colouration of the abdominal tergites, with large median, and smaller lateral dark spots (Figure 1E) and the distinct aedeagus (Figure 5M–O). Description Forebody length 7.4–7.9 mm. Colour of head and pronotum shining metallic bronze; mesoscutellum and depressed areas of elytra directly lateral of mesoscutellum dark brown to black; elytra, antennae and legs dark orange-brown. Abdomen with distinct colouration pattern (tergites each with large median, and smaller lateral dark spots) shown in Figure 1E; segment 8 orange. Epicranium (Figure 2E) with small to medium-sized punctures, distance between punctures as wide as 1–1.5 punctures. Antennomere 1–4 without tomentose pubescence. Mandibles straight, except apically. Neck with dense, small punctures. Pronotum width/length ratio = 1; pronotum with dense medium-sized punctures; pronotum with confused rows of punctures (Figure 2E); superior marginal line of pronotal hypomeron joins inferior marginal line before neck. Elytra length/pronotal length ratio = 1.23–1.27; elytra with small punctures and many wrinkled irregularities between punctures. Metacoxal shield subquadrate but with emarginate posterior margin (Figure 3E); abdominal tergites 3–4 without faint curved line posterior to anterior transverse basal line. Sternite 7 in males with circular porose structure (Figure 4E); sternite 8 with U-shaped emargination (Figure 4E). Aedeagus as in Figures 5M–O; in ventral view paramere wide, converging to pointed apex; paramere shorter and much narrower than median lobe; in lateral view paramere parallel-sided, with expanded apex; paramere with peg setae in two short rows medially as in Figure 5N. Median lobe in ventral view wide, converging to narrow pointed tip; in lateral view median lobe becoming narrower near apex; median lobe with apical tooth. Endophallus in ventral and lateral view converging to narrow apex. Distribution Known from the states of Goiás, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro and Santa Catarina in Brazil (Figure 6). Habitat Collected in lowland tropical forests; a few specimen labels indicated that the specimen was collected with Acromyrmex sp. ants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207