Paraxenopygus opacipennis Bernhauer. Scale 1927
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paraxenopygus opacipennis Bernhauer, 1927 (Figures 1E, 2E, 3E, 4E, 5M–O, 6) Paraxenopygus opacipennis Bernhauer, 1927, p. 166. Type material Holotype, female, with labels: ‘ Itatiaya, Est. do Rio [Brazil: Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia, −22.50°, −44.56°], 100 m, 17.vi.1925, J.F. Zikan [leg.]’/‘ Paraxenopygus opacipennis Brnh Typus unic’./‘ Chicago NHMus M. Bernhauer Collection’ /‘ Bernhauer Brazil Types Photographed E. Caron 2017’/‘FMNHINS3048929’. Bernhauer (1927) mentioned that he had only one specimen, therefore this is the holotype. In the collection of FMNH. Additional materials BRAZIL: Goiás: Jatai [−17.88°, −51.83°], Fauvel leg. (1 female RISNB); Minas Gerais: Viçosa, Universidade Federal de Viçosa [−20.76°, −42.87°], 21.vi.1999, F.Z. Vaz-de-Mello leg. (1 female CZUG); Paraná: Piraquara Mananciais da Sierra, −25.493°, −48.979°, 11.xi.2011, Acromyrmex refuse, M. Caterino and A. Tishechkin leg. (1 male, 1 female UFPR); Rio de Janeiro: Rio de Janeiro [−22.91°, −43.20°], Fry coll., Bernhauer coll. (1 female FMNH); Reprasa Guanabara [−22.951°, −43.211°], vi.1966, malaise, M. Alvarenga leg., Scheepeltz coll. (1 female NMW); Santa Catarina: Nova Teutônia [Seara] [−27.25°, −50.33°], xi.[19]72, with Acromyrmex, F. Plaumann leg., Newton coll. (1 male, 1 female FMNH); same locality and collector, ix.1966, (1 female MZSP); same locality and collector, 7.xii.1938, Bernhauer coll. (1 male FMNH); same locality and collector, 21.v.1941 (1 female CNC); same locality and collector, 21.vi.1941 (1 female CNC); same locality and collector, 300–500 m, x.1952 (1 female CNC); same locality and collector, x.1950 (1 male CNC); same locality and collector, xii.1942 (1 male CNC); unknown state: unknown locality, Brown coll., Sharp coll. (1 female NHMUK). Diagnosis Paraxenopygus opacipennis can be distinguished from all other species of Paraxenopygus by the metallic bronze colouration of the head and pronotum (Figure 2E), the colouration of the abdominal tergites, with large median, and smaller lateral dark spots (Figure 1E) and the distinct aedeagus (Figure 5M–O). Description Forebody length 7.4–7.9 mm. Colour of head and pronotum shining metallic bronze; mesoscutellum and depressed areas of elytra directly lateral of mesoscutellum dark brown to black; elytra, antennae and legs dark orange-brown. Abdomen with distinct colouration pattern (tergites each with large median, and smaller lateral dark spots) shown in Figure 1E; segment 8 orange. Epicranium (Figure 2E) with small to medium-sized punctures, distance between punctures as wide as 1–1.5 punctures. Antennomere 1–4 without tomentose pubescence. Mandibles straight, except apically. Neck with dense, small punctures. Pronotum width/length ratio = 1; pronotum with dense medium-sized punctures; pronotum with confused rows of punctures (Figure 2E); superior marginal line of pronotal hypomeron joins inferior marginal line before neck. Elytra length/pronotal length ratio = 1.23–1.27; elytra with small punctures and many wrinkled irregularities between punctures. Metacoxal shield subquadrate but with emarginate posterior margin (Figure 3E); abdominal tergites 3–4 without faint curved line posterior to anterior transverse basal line. Sternite 7 in males with circular porose structure (Figure 4E); sternite 8 with U-shaped emargination (Figure 4E). Aedeagus as in Figures 5M–O; in ventral view paramere wide, converging to pointed apex; paramere shorter and much narrower than median lobe; in lateral view paramere parallel-sided, with expanded apex; paramere with peg setae in two short rows medially as in Figure 5N. Median lobe in ventral view wide, converging to narrow pointed tip; in lateral view median lobe becoming narrower near apex; median lobe with apical tooth. Endophallus in ventral and lateral view converging to narrow apex. Distribution Known from the states of Goiás, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro and Santa Catarina in Brazil (Figure 6). Habitat Collected in lowland tropical forests; a few specimen labels indicated that the specimen was collected with Acromyrmex sp. ants.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle