MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911719109 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13833355

Eupavlovskia Popov 1955, stat. rev.

2024· article· en· W6911719109 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)DorsumHexagonal crystal systemSensuAnterior surfaceSensu stricto

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eupavlovskia Popov, 1955 stat. rev. Melecta, sensu Michener 2000, 2007 (former subgenus). Diagnosis. Diagnosis is best made in the male sex, as there are no known characters present in the female sex which allow unambiguous separation from all other melectine genera. Generally robust, moderately large bees, 12.5–16 mm in length. Mesosoma covered with long and dense pubescence, this particularly evident on the dorsal surface where it covers and obscures the pronotal tubercules, scutum, scutellum, and scutellar spines. Marginal cell of forewing short, three times as long as broad, only slightly exceeding the third submarginal cell. Labrum almost square, widest basally, surface slightly concave, anterior border entire, little upturned, with rounded side edges, basal tubercles only weakly projecting but generally large. Hind tibia of the male strongly broadened and expanded at its apex, with strong ventroapical process extending laterally beyond the base of the tibial spurs. Inner hind tibial spur noticeably longer than the outer, gently and variably curved in different directions, appearing weakly undulate. Hind basitarsis of the male strongly to moderately broadened in its apical half to two-thirds. Male antennae without rhinarial pits on their posterior faces (sensu Lieftinck). T 7 of male subtruncate, apex clothed with appressed tomentum. S 7 very slender, with narrow, widely divergent arms and bilobed apex, the lobes fringed with strong bristles; S 8 with well-developed ridges in apical half, apex itself with tufts of long feathery hairs. Due to the thickly hairy mesosoma, Eupavlovskia can appear superficially quite similar to Tetralonioidella, but they may be separated by a short marginal cell (the most common character state for melectine bees) that only extends slightly beyond the apex of the third submarginal cell, the marginal cell itself being clearly shorter in maximum length than the length of the three submarginal cells combined; it is also shorter than the distance between its apex and the apex of the forewing. In Tetralonioidella the marginal cell is much longer, exceeding the third marginal cell and only slightly shorter than the length of the three submarginal cells combined; it is longer than the distance between its apex and the apex of the forewing. From other Eastern Hemisphere melectine bees, Eupavlovskia is separated by the scutellum, which is not flattened into a plate that overhangs the declivity of the propodeum and by the presence of arolia (with a plate-like scutellum and without arolia in Thyreus), by the three submarginal cells (two submarginal cells in Sinomelecta Baker, 1997), by the length of T 1, which is dorsally shorter than T 2 and the presence of arolia (T 1 longer than to scarcely shorter than T 2 dorsally and with arolia absent or nearly so in Afromelecta Lieftinck, 1972 and Thyreomelecta), from all Melecta or currently recognized Melecta subgenera by the combination of the long and dense mesosomal pilosity, the shape of the male legs, the absence of rhinaria on the antennal segments, and the structure of the male S 7–8. Distribution. From Spain in the west across the Western Palearctic to Central Asia (Uzbekistan, Bukhara; Lieftinck 1969). Not present in Africa or the Levant. Composed of two species, Eupavlovskia funeraria (Smith, 1854) from Spain to the Caucasus and Eupalvovskia obscura (Friese, 1895) from Italy to Uzbekistan. Comments. Eupavlovskia, Paracrocisa and Pseudomelecta Radoszkowski, 1865 were separated from Melecta at the generic level by Lieftinck (1969; 1972; 1983), but Michener (2007) considered the given characters insufficiently distinctive and instead considered them as subgenera. We show here that Eupavlovskia is valid and separate from Melecta and its other groups (via molecular work here and prior morphological accounts), and formally return it to the generic level once more; further work is necessary on the rare groups Melecta (Paracrocisa) and Melecta (Pseudomelecta) to ascertain whether they also warrant generic-level treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPlant and animal studies→French-language works237,207→