Chondrophycus planiparvus Popolizio, C. W. Schneider & C. E. Lane 2022, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chondrophycus planiparvus Popolizio, C.W.Schneider & C.E.Lane, sp. nov. (Fig. 5) HOLOTYPE. — T.R. Popolizio / C.W. Schneider 12-40-13 (BDA0934), 13.III.2012, Gurnet Rock, mouth of Castle Harbour, Bermuda, western Atlantic Ocean, 32°20’22.7”N, 64°39’44.8”W, depth 13 m [deposited in UNB]; iso-, MICH [TRP 12-40-12 (BDA0933)]. HOLOTYPE DNA BARCODE. — GenBank OK209884, COI-5P; OK209859, rbc L. PARATYPES. — Bermuda. CWS/CEL 09-30-9, 19.III.2009, Gurnet Rock, loc. cit., 32°20’20.2”N, 64°39’32.1”W, depth 16-17 m; TRP/ CWS 12-148-6 [BDA1625], 5.XI.2012, wreck of the Pelinaion, north shore Bermuda I., 32°21’20.9”N, 64°38’36.9”W, depth 18 m; TRP/CWS 12-160-8 [BDA1741], 1.XII.2012, wreck of the Hermes, south shore Bermuda I., 32°14’42.4”N, 64°48’00.1”W, depth 23 m. ETYMOLOGY. — From the Latin, describing the typical habit of this flattened (‘ planus ’) and relatively small (‘ parvus ’) species. DISTRIBUTION. — Endemic to Bermuda as presently known. SEASONALITY. — Collected from November to March in Bermuda. DESCRIPTION Plants to 2 cm high, distinctly compressed, rosy-red, cartilaginous (Fig. 5 A-D); main axes to 2 mm diam. with one or more arising from discoidal holdfasts; branching irregular to opposite or alternate, with branch apices sometimes appearing trifurcated (Fig. 5B, D); branchlets to 2 mm in diam. Vegetative axes with 2 pericentral cells; cortical cells arranged longitudinally in surface view (Fig. 5E, H), secondary pit connections abundant (Fig. 5G, H). In transverse section, non-palisade outer cortical cells, obtriangulate to obovate, with constrictions at the base (Fig. 5G), 12-35 µm diam. and 9-27 µm long, some acute projections present at branch apices in surface view; outer cortical cells ovoid in upper branch regions, irregularly angular and elongated below, 9-55 µm diam. and 20-100 µm long (Fig. 5H); lenticular thickenings absent in the walls of medullary cells. Extensive trichoblasts emerging from shallow apical pits (Fig. 5F), dichotomously branched, to 600 µm long. Tetrasporangia forming at apices, slightly ovoid, arranged at right angles to the axis (Saito 1967: 71), 43-68 µm diam. and 48-96 µm long (Fig. 5I). Gametangia not found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".