MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911768369 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1405102

X-Rays From Cepheids: Why?

2018· article· en· W6911768369 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetohydrodynamic driveShock wavePhase (matter)Magnetic fieldEnvelope (radar)Event (particle physics)Shock (circulatory)Waveform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent Chandra and XMM X-ray observations have found a burst of X-rays at the surprising phase just after maximum radius. At this phase the photospheric spectrum is indistinguishable from a non-variable supergiant. Significant photospheric disruptions, however, are seen just after minimum radius, as the pulsation wave generated lower in the envelope passes through. The X-ray burst is thought to be caused either from by a shock in the pulsation process or a flare, possibly triggered by the collapse of the atmosphere. We present a first examination of these possibilities by calculating the energy ranges and timescales for each mechanism. A flare-like event is expected to have a strong dependence on local magnetic field strength and present a more rapid energy release due to reconnection. Finally, we estimate how much a hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic compression wave propagating outward in a stratified medium, such as the stellar coronae, could heat the ambient material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207