Bibliographic record
Abstract
286 Euura erecta (Lindqvist, 1945) Figs 300, 526–527 Amauronematus erectus Lindqvist, 1945: 107–108. Syntypes ♀ ♂ (MZH?), not located. Type localities: Finland, Lapland; Sweden, Virihaure; Russia, Dudinka. Diagnosis Females are most similar to E. malaisei, which also has a rather long valvula 3 (tends to be shorter in other species of viduata group). The lancet is less curved in E. erecta than in E. malaisei. Penis valves are most similar to E. malaisei, E. leucolena and E. rectiserra, but in some specimens (DEIGISHym12074, 210009_LGB) of E. erecta the apex of pseudoceps forms a small filament. The other males we have checked (DEI-GISHym12062, DEI-GISHym84015) lack the filament at the apex of pseudoceps and are genetically somewhat different. Nevertheless, the genetic variability is large as indicated by heterozygous females. The females, which we have identified based on morphology, seem to cover the genetic variability between the males. The specimens 210008_SSR and 210009_LGB were caught in copula on Salix lanata. Host plants Salix lanata. Macek et al. (2020) reported Salix aurita, but this is probably based on a misidentification of the sawfly. For example, the penis valve shown for E. erecta by Macek et al. (2020) belongs to the E. bipartita group (perhaps E. connecta). Genetics COI Based on 21 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 3.5% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.15%, is Euura leucolena. Nuclear Based on 21 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 1.08% (1.01% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.09%, is Euura leucolena (ZMUO.041208). Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".