Bibliographic record
Abstract
116 Euura infirma (Förster, 1854) Figs 105, 339 Nematus infirmus Förster, 1854a: 316–318. Lectotype designated by Taeger & Blank (1998). Nematus subaequalis Förster, 1854a: 305–307. Lectotype designated by Taeger & Blank (1998). Synonymy by Taeger & Blank (1998). Diagnosis The females are most similar to E. gehrsi, E. annulata, and E. oehlkei, but can be distinguished based on lancets which are ventrally concave and have serrulae present also on basal-most annuli (ventrally slightly convex in E. gehrsi and E. annulata and basal 2–3 annuli without serrulae in E. gehrsi, E. annulata, and E. oehlkei). Valvula 3 is also narrower in dorsal view than in E. gehrsi, E. annulata, and perhaps E. oehlkei. Male penis valves are clearly distinguishable from the other Euura. Pseudoceps of the penis valve is apically filament-like, which is otherwise only seen in a few species of Euura that have bifid claws (small subapical tooth in E. infirma). Female 3.7–3.9 mm. Head slightly to extensively pale around eyes; labrum, clypeus, and supraclypeal area pale; thorax black; pronotum black or posteriorly slightly pale; tegula pale; pterostigma pale; metafemur extensively pale; metatibia pale; hind tarsus black; abdomen black; valvifer 2 pale; valvula 3 black or brown, in dorsal view narrow and with acute apex. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus infirmus GERMANY – Nordrhein-Westfalen • ♂; Aachen area; 50.77° N, 6.09° E; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym 3303. Lectotype Nematus subaequalis GERMANY – Nordrhein-Westfalen • ♀; Aachen area; 50.77° N, 6.09° E; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3445. Host plants Bistorta officinalis (Macek et al. 2020; rearings by Alexey Zinovjev). Genetics COI Based on 3 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.46% and the nearest neighbours, diverging by a minimum of 4.86%, are Euura polaris and E. poppii. Nuclear Based on 2 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0% (0.33% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.92%, is Euura gehrsi. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from France, Germany, Italy, and Russia. Euura infirma should be removed from the Finnish list, because the records probably refer to E. gehrsi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".