Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Phytoliriomyza Hendel, 1931 Phytoliriomyza Hendel, 1931: 203 (as subgenus of Liriomyza). TYPE SPECIES OF SUBGENUS. — Agromyza perpusilla Meigen, 1830. REMARKS This genus was originally erected for species having proclinate orbital setulae (in addition to other characters) which easily separate this genus from other similar agromyzid genera, especially Liriomyza. But the concept of the genus has evolved, now encompassing also species with upright or reclinate orbital setulae and some without orbital setulae. The colour is also variable with some species having the mesonotum and scutellum dark (typically greyish), while others feature a yellow scutellum and sometimes pre-scutellar area, like several Liriomyza species. However, unlike Liriomyza, male Phytoliriomyza do not possess a stridulatory organ. Most Phytoliriomyza have only three orbital bristles including two ors and one ori (some species, e.g., P.grandis (Spencer, 1963) from Brazil have two ors and three ori). The halter is often slightly darkened apically or completely brown and the male genitalia is usually distinctive with conspicuous spines on the surstyli and on the inner margin of epandrium. Only two specimens were collected on the Mitaraka massif (Boucher & Pollet 2021) which proved to belong to Phytoliriomyza jurgensi Spencer, 1983 originally described from Costa Rica (Spencer 1983) and later found to occur in Guadeloupe and St-Christopher (Étienne & Martinez 2003a, b).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".