MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6911823642 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15277273

Perilampus hyalinus Say 1829

2025· article· en· W6911823642 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulcusSimple eye in invertebratesGroove (engineering)Oblique caseMedian planeApex (geometry)Dorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perilampus hyalinus species group P. hyalinus species group sensu Smulyan (1936) and Darling (1996). Description. FEMALE. Color: head and body entirely or at least partially brightly iridescent blue, green, violet, or cupreous (Fig. 2A–C). Head: in anterior view weakly transverse, slightly wider than high, HW/HH 1.2–1.3; slightly wider than pronotum, HW/PW 1.1–1.2. Frontal carina: distinct, extended from posterior margin of median ocellus (Fig. 2A) to near lower eye margin; in dorsal view narrow around median ocellus. Ocelli: median ocellus in line with lateral ocelli or only slightly advanced. Eye: slightly shorter than head height, EH/HH 0.6–0.7. Vertex: rounded behind. Occiput: with vertical groove below vertex, with subparallel costulae; occipital carina absent. Malar space: with oblique striae obliterating malar sulcus (Fig. 2B). Clypeus: weakly transverse to strongly transverse, CW/ CH 1.3– 1.6; lateral sulci straight or weakly curved, strongly divergent; with small and indistinct tentorial pits; epistomal sulcus concave, deeper and more distinct than lateral sulci; ventral margin concave or nearly straight. Supraclypeal area: subquadrate; shorter and narrower than clypeus, SCH/ CH 0.5–0.6. Scape: length about 0.6× EH; narrow throughout; pits absent or if present distad covering no more than 0.2× scape length. Flagellum: anellus transverse, AL/PL about 0.3; Fu1 subquadrate, Fu1L/Fu1W 1.0–1.1; subequal to or slightly longer in length than pedicel, Fu1L/PL 1.0–1.3; Fu2 subquadrate or transverse, Fu3–Fu7 transverse; clava 4-segmented, C1–3 as long dorsad as ventrad, with distinct terminal button (C4). Mesosoma: slightly longer than wide, ML/MW 1.2–1.3. Pronotum: carinulate; short, PN/MSC about 0.2; shorter along midline, 0.5–0.7 length laterad; anterior margin sharp, all rows of punctures on same plane. Lateral panel of pronotum: without flange or with flange below level of mesothoracic spiracle in posterior oblique view; anterior margin sharp, all rows of punctures on same plane. Prepectus: wide and triangular; differentiated from pronotum with distinct suture; ventral strap short, without row of alveolae; central area of lateral panel smooth, with foveae along dorsal and posterior margins. Mesoscutum: midlobe without tubercle; notaulus distinct and continuous, uninterrupted by sculpture of mesoscutum. Mesoscutellum: without tubercle; slightly longer than mesoscutum, SC/MSC 1.2–1.3; strongly vaulted, frenum ventrad and not visible in the dorsal view. Axilla: with axillar shelf (Fig. 2C). Axillula: elongate and finger-like, AxL/AxH usually 2.0 or greater (Fig. 2C). Metanotum: short, length 0.4–0.5× length of propodeum along midline. Propodeum: width about 3× length along midline; submedian area smooth to weakly imbricate, with foveae or groove laterad median carina, delimited laterad and ventrad by complete plicae, dorsad by transverse band of foveae; callus with angulate process below spiracle, and alveolate-rugose, with alveolae sometimes obliterated below spiracle; nucha with transverse to arcuate rugae. Fore wing: elongate, WL/ WW 2.3–2.4; hyaline, with yellow or brown venation; parastigma swollen with weak equilateral triangular process; postmarginal vein 0.7–0.8× as long as marginal vein; stigmal vein 0.3–0.4× as long as marginal vein; stigma with weak uncus. Metasoma: petiole short and straplike, with weak transverse wrinkles; petiolar flange short with ventral margin of upper area with shallow emargination mesad; antecostal sulcus transverse, with weak vertical carinae laterad and smoothened mesad; Mt2 with trapezoidal demarcation and shallow median groove, imbricate and wrinkled anteriad, and smooth posterad without lateral protuberances along midline, posterior margin straight and sparsely setose; Mt3 smooth. MALE. As in female, except: color: mesonotum sometimes nearly entirely black or with cupreous iridescence. Eye: in dorsal view often more bulbous. Ocellus: often larger. Ocellar ratios LOD: POL: OOL: LOL: often shorter. Frontal carina: distance from lateral ocellus usually shorter. Lower face setae: as dense or denser around and below torulus. Malar space: MSL/EH often shorter. Flagellum: slightly wider. Scape: in anterior view weakly expanded distad, 1.3–1.4× width above radicle; with distinct pits on anterior surface; pitted surface not swollen in lateral view. Aedeagus: without a pair of lateral spines. Diagnosis. The P. hyalinus species group is characterized by brightly iridescent coloration (Fig. 2A–C), a distinct frontal carina extended from the posterior margin of the median ocellus (Fig. 2A cf. Fig. 2D) to near the lower eye margin, oblique costae obliterating malar sulcus (Fig. 2B cf. Fig. 2E), a carinulate pronotum (Yoo and Darling 2024, fig. 2H), a distinct and uninterrupted notaulus (Yoo and Darling 2024, fig. 2H), an axilla with an axillar shelf (Fig. 2C cf. Fig. 2F), and an elongate, finger-like axillula (Fig. 2C cf. Fig. 2F). The P. platigaster species group has a similar structure of the frontal carina, axilla, and axillula, but is distinguished by having a malar sulcus (Fig. 2E) and general body color that is black with or without weak iridescent reflections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→