Bibliographic record
Abstract
STEPHANODES Enock, 1909 (Figs 309–313) Stephanodes Enock, 1909: 457. Type species: Stephanodes elegans Enock, 1909, by monotypy. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Face with subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus, with pit medial to and slightly above dorsal margin of each torulus and toruli separated by about 2× their own height from transverse trabecula (Fig. 309a); vertex with large depression outside ocellar triangle next to each ocellus (Fig. 309b); scape with inner surface rasp-like or with distinct transverse carinae; mesonotal spiracle much closer to anterior apex of notaulus than to dorsal apex of prepectus (Fig. 312); propleura abutting each other anterior to prosternum; petiole attached posteriorly to gs 1 (Fig. 313a); mesosoma and metasoma smooth and shiny. Remarks. Stephanodes belongs to the Polynema group of genera. Stephanodes is unique in having the mesonotal spiracle advanced anteriorly, closer to the anterior apex of the notaulus than to the tegula or dorsal apex of the prepectus. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important references. Huber & Fidalgo (1997), Huber et al. (2020).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".