Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Martiodrilus Michaelsen, 1936 Martiodrilus Michaelsen, 1936: 1172. — Righi 1971: 4; 1995: 512. — Zicsi & Csuzdi 1997: 82. — Zicsi 2001: 113. — Csuzdi & Pavlíček 2011: 57. Thamnodrilus – Michaelsen 1900: 434. — Černosvitov 1935: 18. Thamnodrilus (Thamnodrilus) (part.) — Michaelsen 1918: 86. — Černosvitov 1934: 53. — Fragoso & Brown 2007: 59. Thamnodriloides – Csuzdi & Pavlíček 2011: 58. TYPE SPECIES. — Hypogaeon heterostichon Schmarda, 1861. DIAGNOSIS. — Setae arranged in eight regular longitudinal lines. One pair of intra-clitellar male pores. Five to eight pairs of calciferous glands in segments VII-XI, XII, XIII, XIV of tubular structure or alveolar structure. Genital apparatus holandric and metagynous. Seminal vesicles generally short, limited to one segment.Spermathecae in pre-testicular segments (Righi 1971). Ovaries in XIII. Four sub-genera are separated depending on the type of anterior septa, the type of nephridia and the number of spermathecae (Csuzdi & Pavlicek 2011): Martiodrilus (Martiodrilus) Michaelsen, 1936 has strongly thickened septa after the gizzard and nephridia with a single nephrostome; Martiodrilus (Cordilleroscoloex) Zicsi & Csuzdi, 1997 has strongly thickened septa after the gizzard and nephridia with multiple nephrostomes; Martiodrilus (Botaria) Zicsi, 1998 has membranous septa after gizzard, nephridia with a single nephrostome and two to three pairs of spermathecae; Martiodrilus (Maipure) Righi, 1995 membranous septa after gizzard, nephridia with a single nephrostome and four to six pairs of spermathecae. DISTRIBUTION. — Martiodrilus comprises 85 valid species (not including the new species described here) distributed in South and Central America: Ecuador (57 species), Colombia (22 species), French Guiana (seven species), Peru (six species), Brazil (three species), Surinam (three species), Panama (two species) and Guyana (one species) (http://taxo.drilobase.org/; Misirlioğlu et al. 2023; Brown et al. 2023).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".