MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6911953458 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13919644

GIEMS-MethaneCentric v1.1

2025· dataset· en· W6911953458 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandVegetation (pathology)Hydrology (agriculture)Normalized Difference Vegetation IndexVegetation coverAncillary data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Inundation Extent from Multi-Satellites-MethaneCentric (GIEMS-MC) provides two harmonized times series maps at 0.25°x0.25° and monthly time step of wetland surfaces from 1992 to 2020: one representing inundated and saturated wetlands, and the other covering all wetlands, including peatlands. In addition, GIEMS-MC provides consistent 0.25°x0.25° maps of rice paddies (from MIRCA2000) and open permanent water categories (from GLWDv2) used in its production. Information on the dominant vegetation type and wetland type per pixel is also provided. GIEMS-MC v1.1 is the version used in related publication :Bernard, J., Prigent, C., Jimenez, C., Fluet-Chouinard, E., Lehner, B., Salmon, E., Ciais, P., Zhang, Z., Peng, S., and Saunois, M.: The GIEMS-MethaneCentric database: a dynamic and comprehensive global product of methane-emitting aquatic areas, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2985–3008, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2985-2025, 2025. The differences between GIEMS-MC v1.1 and v1.0 are minor. These include the inclusion of Deltas in ancillary information and the correction of typos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0820.094

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)French-language works237,207