Tesserodon papuanum Paulian 1985
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tesserodon papuanum Paulian, 1985: 221 (original description) Name-bearing type data. Holotype ♂ (CMNC): || PAPUA NEW GUINEA | Wau, 1400 m. | 29.VI-2.VII.1974. S. Peck | carrion traps 18-19 ||; || PAPUA NEW GUINEA | Wau, 1400 m. | 29.vi-2.vii.74 | S. Peck, carT18-19 || [photocopy of handwritten label]; || H. & A.Howden | Collection ||; || HOLOTYPE || [red card]; || Canadian Museum of | Musée canadien de la | NATURE | CMNEN 00011856 || [QR code label]; || Tesserodon | papuanum n.sp. | R. Paulian det. || [partly handwritten]. Studied. Material examined (21 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀). PAPUA NEW GUINEA: MOROBE PROVINCE, Aseki Road, 56 km W Bululo, 1750 m, 07°19’33’’S, 146°20’49’’E, 8.ii.2000, mixed montane forest litter, R.S. Anderson, (RSA2000- 039a)— 2 ♂♂ (CMNC); Gumi L.A. Bulolo, 2134 m, [07°11’S, 146°25’E], 18.xi.1984, infly trap, H. Roberts, (C.I.E. A16609)— 1 ♂ (NHMUK); Mount Kaindi, 9 km NNW Wau, 2050 m, 07°20’24’’S, 146°40’01’’E, 6.ii.2000, montane forest litter, R.S. Anderson, (RSA2000-035b)— 1 ♂ (CMNC); Wau, 1219 m, [07°20’S, 146°43’E], 1–3.vii.1974, forest litter, berlese, S. Peck — 1 ♀ (CMNC); same locality, 1–3.vii.1974, H. Howden — 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (MNHN); Wau, 1400 m, [07°20’S, 146°43’E], 29.vi.–2.vii.1974, carrion traps, S. Peck, (carrion traps 18-19)— ♂ holotype, 12 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀ paratypes (CMNC), 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ paratypes (MNHN); same locality, 29.vi.–2.vii.1974, carrion traps, S. Peck, (carrion trap 20)— ♀ allotype (CMNC), 1 ♂ paratype (MNHN). Redescription. Measurements. Body length 4.1–5.3 mm, maximum body width 2.7–3.1 mm. Body. Overall body shape in dorsal view oval, elytral edge evenly rounded from base to apex. Head. Clypeal edge lateral to clypeal teeth lacking emargination, head margin at clypeogenal suture of females slightly protruding. Dorsal parts of eyes semi-ovoid, separated by an interocular space of about 3.9 times eye width. Pronotum. Pronotal width to length along midline ratio 1.9, lateral pronotal edge rounded, pronotal pubescence short and fine, pronotal basal portion along midline lacking fine longitudinal depression. Elytra. Elytral maximum width to length along suture ratio 1.0, elytral outline moderately convex in lateral view, elytral pubescence short and fine, elytral surface between punctures appearing glossy, at most with ill-defined microsculptures, basal elytral pit slightly wider than stria 10 and shallow, basal surface of pseudepipleuron with irregularly distributed more or less defined punctures, interstriae 3–5 on basal fifth with scattered unaligned punctures. Legs. Profemoral anterior surface flat, male metatibial apicointernal tooth approximately in line with posterior tibial edge. Pygidium. Pygidial surface along midline with punctures absent or distinctly more scattered than rest of discs, at least basally, pygidial surface along basal groove smooth between punctures (Fig. 8F), pygidium of female evenly convex. Aedeagus. Left paramere apex truncated apically, distinctly angular externally (Fig. 10B). Female genitalia. Spermatheca with two apodemes basally and one apodeme apically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".