Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENTRICHOPTERIS YOSHIMOTO, 1990 (Figs 119–123) Entrichopteris Yoshimoto, 1990: 62. Type species: Entrichopteris eberhardi Yoshimoto, 1990, by original designation. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and without a pit medially next to each torulus (Fig. 119a); toruli separated by just over their own height from transverse trabecula; propleura widely separated from each other anterior to prosternum; fore wing with two distinct, dark transverse bands and fairly long discal setae as well as long, straggly marginal setae (Fig. 121); entire venation very close to anterior margin of wing (costal cell extremely narrow), parastigma with short, inconspicuous proximal, and distal macrochetae and marginal vein absent (Fig. 121); hind wing strongly curved (Fig. 121); propodeum apparently without median carina except a short one just dorsal to petiole (Fig. 122); petiole attached posteriorly apparently to gt 1. Remarks. Entrichopteris belongs to the Polynema group of genera. The fore wing with long, unkempt marginal setae, two wide transverse dark bands with fairly long suberect setae and strongly curved hind wing are unique. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Distribution. Several countries in Central America and northern South America (CNC, UCRC). Important reference. Yoshimoto (1990).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".