Bibliographic record
Abstract
NOTOMYMAR Doutt & Yoshimoto, 1970 (Figs 211–217) Notomymar Doutt & Yoshimoto, 1970: 293. Type species: Notomymar aptenosoma Doutt & Yoshimoto, 1970, by original designation. Diagnosis. Face with faint subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus (Fig. 215a); toruli separated by their own height from transverse trabecula; mandibles each with 2 teeth, the dorsal one wide and apically serrated, the teeth overlapping medially when mandibles closed (Fig. 215a); funicle 6-segmented; clava 3-segmented (Figs 212, 216); both sexes apparently apterous (Fig. 213), brachypterous or macropterous (Fig. 217). Male flagellum 9-segmented, with the apical two segments widely joined. Remarks. Notomymar belongs to the Anagrus group of genera. The other genera in the group with a 3-segmented clava are Krokella, Neopolynemoidea, Neostethynium, Paranaphoidea (Idiocentrus) and Stethynium. Two species are illustrated: the apparently wingless species from South Georgia Island, and a fully winged species from mainland South America. At high elevations (4000 m) in Ecuador another, almost wingless, described species (Yoshimoto 1990) has a similar mandible to the type species. Macropterous specimens of Notomymar appear to be most similar to species of Neostethynium so Notomymar may eventually be shown to be a synonym of Neostethynium. The only differences that distinguish Neostethynium from Notomymar (either winged or wingless) appear to be the size and position of the ocelli, the head shape in lateral view, and the presence or absence of a transoccipital sulcus. In Neostethynium the ocelli are large and close together and the vertex is flat and at right angle to face, and there is no transoccipital sulcus, whereas in Notomymar the ocelli are small and far apart (Figs 211, 215b), the vertex is more convex and not at a sharp right angle with the face, and there is a distinct transoccipital sulcus (Fig. 215b). The generic limits are unclear, partly because it is so difficult to determine relationships of macropterous species, with their various reductions in the mesosoma. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Doutt & Yoshimoto (1970).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".