MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6912084069 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14753460

Limnonectes splendissimus Le, Nguyen, Murphy, Tran, Nguyen & Che, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6912084069 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Radiography and Imaging
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElevation (ballistics)GenusAdult maleTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limnonectes splendissimus sp. nov. Holotype. ITBCZ 8674, an adult male (Figs. 3 & 4), collected from Gung Re Commune, Di Linh District, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam; coordinates 11 o 27’11.6”N, 108 o 05’32.3”E; elevation 1369 m a.s.l. by Manh V. Le and Tuan M. Nguyen, on 22 September 2023. Paratypes. Seven specimens: ITBCZ 8675, 8676 (two adult males, Fig. 5A–D), ITBCZ 8677 (subadult male, Fig. 5E, F), ITBCZ 8678 (adult female), collected by the same collectors, on the same date and site as the holotype; ITBCZ 8679 (adult female, Fig. 5G, H) collected from Voi Mountain, Hiep Thanh Commune, Duc Trong District, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam; coordinates 11 o 49’39.4”N, 108 o 24’29.2”E; elevation 1611 m a.s.l by Manh V. Le and Tuan M. Nguyen, on 23 September 2023; ITBCZ 3626 (subadult female, Fig. 5I, K) and ITBCZ 3627 (juvenile, Fig. 5L, M) collected from Voi Mountain, Hiep Thanh Commune, Duc Trong District, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam; coordinates 11 o 49’39.4”N, 108 o 24’29.2”E; elevation 1488 m a.s.l by Luan T. Nguyen, Manh V. Le, Tuan M. Nguyen, Dzung T.T. Tran, on 25 February 2023. Diagnosis. The new species belongs to the genus Limnonectes based on both molecular analyses (Portik et al. 2023) and morphological assessment because it has fang-like odontoid processes on its lower jaw, and with males being larger than females (Emerson et al. 2000). Limnonectes splendissimus sp. nov. can be distinguished from all of its congeners by a combination of the following morphological characters: large body size (SVL 104.1–107.0 mm in adult males, 87.2–97.7 mm in adult females); head length longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.91± 0.01 in adult males, 0.87± 0.08 in adult females); males with increased head height and a nuptial pad on Finger I; tympanum distinct; eye diameter about three-fifths of tympanum-eye distance in adult males (ED/TED = 0.62±0.13) while longer than in adult females (ED/TED = 1.40±0.02); presence of vomerine teeth; odontoid developed (OH 8.0± 0.6 mm in adult males, 4.5± 0.9 mm in adult females); finger length relative III>I>II>IV, no webbing between fingers; relative toe lengths IV>III>V>II>I; toes webbed to distal of terminal phalanx, formula I0-0II0-0III0-0IV0-0V; throat pattern of juveniles distinct with black and white spots that cover both the throat and the anterior half of venter, posterior half of venter yellow. Description of holotype. Adult male, large body size, SVL 105.4 mm; habitus robust with enlarged head (HL/SVL = 0.48); head length longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.91); snout round anteriorly in dorsal view, projecting beyond lower jaw; rostral length greater than eye diameter (RL 15.3 mm, ED 8.8 mm); nostril lateral, elongate, ovoid, closer to tip of snout than to eye (NS 6.1 mm, EN 9.4 mm); interorbital distance wider than internarial distance and upper eyelid width (IOD 10.8 mm, IND 8.2 mm, UEW 6.4 mm); canthus rounded; loreals concave; eye diameter approximately equal tympanum diameter (ED/TD = 1.05), eye closer to nostril than tympanum (EN 9.4 mm, TED 14.2 mm); tympanum distinct, slightly elongate, distance between tympanum to eye longer than eye diameter and tympanum diameter (TED 14.2 mm, ED 8.8 mm, TD 8.4 mm). Hypertrophied jaw musculature (adductors) visible on dorsum; supratympanic fold robust, extending from eye to angle of jaw; vomerine teeth on oblique ridges, deflected towards the inside of the choanae, the distance between vomerine teeth rows shorter than distance from vomerine and the choanae. Choanae oval, perpendicular to longitudinal axis of body. Odontoid robust at base tapering to pointed tips, length almost twice depth of mandible. Symphysial knob at mandibular symphysis. Tongue notched deep posterior, about one-fourth of the tongue. Forelimbs. Arms medium in length, upper arm length (UAL) 21.0 mm, forearm length (FAL) 43.6 mm. Tips of finger rounded not expanded into discs with fingers pad elevated; finger length relative III>I>II>IV, no webbing between fingers; fringe on sides of finger I absent, distinct between fingers II–III, indistinct between fingers III–IV; subarticular tubercles prominent, round, formula 1, 1, 1, 1 for finger I, II, III, IV respectively; thenar tubercle at base of finger I large (TTL 5.1 mm), oval, distinct elevated forward; inner metacarpal tubercle at base of finger III (IMC 4.3 mm), slightly rounded; outer metacarpal tubercle small (OMT 3.9 mm), at base of finger IV, elongated; distinct nuptial pad present on finger I. Hindlimbs. Robust and long (total length 181.4 mm). Tibia length longer than thigh length (FeL 52.6 mm; TBL 55.5 mm) and approximately 2.9 times of tibia wide. Tips of toes rounded not expanded into discs, no circummarginal groove, toe pads elevated; relative toe lengths IV>III>V>II>I; toes webbed to distal of terminal phalanx, formula I0-0II0-0III0-0IV0-0V; movable flap of skin distinct on postaxial side toe V from base of toe pad to the metatarsus; movable flap of skin on preaxial side of toe I from base of toe pad to the inner metatarsal tubercle continuing as distinct fold on distal half of tarsus; subarticular tubercles prominent, oval, elevated, formula 1, 1, 2, 3, 2 for toe I, II, III, IV, V, respectively; inner metatarsal tubercle elongated (IMT 6.2 mm) with elevated postaxial border; no outer metatarsal tubercle. Skin. Body smooth in general; dorsal surface of head almost smooth, upper of eyelid with some tubercles; supratympanic fold distinct, extending from eye to angle of jaw; dorsolateral fold absent; dorsal surface of flanks rough scabrous with larger tubercles; dorsal surface of forelimbs smooth; dorsal surface hindlimbs smooth with distinctly small tubercles on half of shank and foot region; throat, chest, belly and ventral surface of thighs smooth, numerous white distinctly small tubercles focus on pre-cloacal region. Coloration in life. Dorsal surface dark reddish brown with black and interrupted mottling patterns; pupil rounded, black, and reflects orangy-red under flash photography (Fig. 3A); light orange interorbital bar, bordered posteriorly by black; iris with mixed between light orangish red and light greyish spots; tympanums particolored with upper black and lower light reddish brown; rostrum reddish brown; upper lip with bars that extend all the way to behind the eye and the orangy-red section is just beneath the tympanum area; lower lip with black and white barring and orange spots; flank surfaces reddish brown with some black spots, orangish red tubercles, and two yellow spots near the armpit and groin; dorsal and anterior surfaces of limbs reddish brown and orangish red, and interrupted with fainted black crossbars; dorsal surface of fingers and toes orangish red with black spots; posterior surface of forelimbs black with light spots; posterior surfaces of thighs pattern mixed between yellow or light yellow with black spots; throat surface pattern grey and white, outer margin mixed with orange, white and black barring, and black spots near base on forelimbs; middle part of ventral surface white, light golden on latter half, with yellow outer margins; ventral surface of forelimbs white; ventral surface of hindlimbs reddish brown or brown with some grey lines, and outer margin yellow; ventral surface of forefoots and hindfoots black (Fig. 3). Coloration in preservation. Dorsum, rostrum, and limbs surfaces faded to brown; surfaces of post-dorsal part, shank, and foot with white small tubercles remain distinct; posterior surfaces of thighs faded to dark grey and some bright brindles; throat surface pattern faded to grey and cream, outer margin faded to cream with black barring; ventral surface of limbs cream (Fig. 4). Variation. Variations in measurements and morphological features of the type series are provided in Table 5 and color variations in life and preservation follow in Figs. 5 & 6. Body color in life varies between individuals within the type series (Fig. 5A, C, E, G, I, L). Juvenile ITBCZ 2627 has a very distinct belly with black and white pattern that covers both the throat and half of ventral, a half ventral latter yellow (Fig. 5L, M). In subadult male and female ITBCZ 8677 and ITBCZ 3626, throat surface pattern faded to grey and white, while the ventral surface is generally yellow (Fig. 5F, K). In adult males and female ITBCZ 8675, 8676 and 8679, the ventral surfaces change from yellow to ochre, yellowish-brown or beige (Fig. 5B, D, H). Body color in preservation changed from brown to grey (Fig. 6A, C, E, G, I, L, N). Throat surface pattern in juvenile and subadults is distinct (Fig. 6K, M, O) but faded in adult males and females (Fig. 6B, D, F, H). Sexual dimorphism. Adult males have larger body sizes than females (SVL 104.1–107.0 mm in adult males vs. 87.2–97.7 mm in adult females); an increased head height; a nuptial pad on finger I present (vs. absent); tympanum-eye distance greater than the eye diameter in adult males and shorter in females (ED/TED = 0.62± 0.13 in adult males vs. 1.40± 0.02 mm in adult females); odontoid height tends to be more prominent (OH 8.0± 0.6 mm in adult males vs. 4.5± 0.9 mm in adult females). Juveniles, subadults, and adults represent differences in throat surface pattern and ventral surface color (Fig. 5). Etymology. Name from Latin “splendissimus ” refers to the splendid coloration on the underside of young individuals. We recommend “Splendid Fanged Frog” and “Ếch nhẽo đốm” as the common English name and Vietnamese name of the new species, respectively. Natural history and Distribution. The new species is currently known from type locality in Lam Dong Province, southern Vietnam (Fig. 7). All specimens were discovered between 20:00 and 24:00 in evergreen forests at elevations exceeding 1300 m a.s.l. The holotype and paratypes ITBCZ 8675–78 were obtained from a small swamp after rainfall (Fig. 8A). Paratype ITBCZ 8679 was collected from a larger swamp (Fig. 8B). Paratypes ITBCZ 2627, 3626 were retrieved from a water hole along the stream. Females carry eggs in Septe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDental Radiography and ImagingFrench-language works237,207